1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katovenus [111]
2 years ago
14

(HELP PLEASE!!! I need to pass and I will give Brain)Why did European nations believe they needed massive armies in the early 19

00s?
O to end conscription
O to secure alliances
O to protect their borders
O to make new weapons
History
2 answers:
Firdavs [7]2 years ago
8 0

Answer1st one

Explanation:

guajiro [1.7K]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The nations of Europe believed that to be truly great, they needed to have a powerful military. By 1914, all the great powers except Britain had a large standing armies. ... This alliance ensure that Britain would not fight against France or Russia but not necessarily go to the war with them.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Hello! Could you help me ere'?
yawa3891 [41]
1. D. he ordered the united states to join the vietnam war.
2. C. Roosevelt vowed to get revenge for the Pearl Harbor attack
3 0
2 years ago
10 POINTS
netineya [11]

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.

Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.

Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.

However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.

Explanation:

nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx

6 0
3 years ago
How did African Americans on southern plantations help the Union cause?
ryzh [129]

They fled to Union camps in the North or West.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is the president of south korea?​
Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

moon je in

Explanation:

thank you so much

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the result of Vietnam’s civil war in 1975?
KIM [24]
A. American involvement helped the democratic south defeat the communist north , and a republic was established
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Explain the process of removing a president from office. What role does the house of Representatives play? What role does the se
    11·1 answer
  • What form of government is the us federal government
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the Gospels use the term "church"? Matthew, Luke & John, or Mark
    14·1 answer
  • Luke's Gospel shows that the author took a special interest in:
    6·2 answers
  • Read the following passage and then answer the question that follows Hinduism has a strong
    11·1 answer
  • Germany's use of the u-boat resulted in many deaths at sea. however, the sinking of which ship resulted in the death of many ame
    6·1 answer
  • Under James monroe,the United States expanded by
    15·2 answers
  • Which geographical feature,made of large treeless areas and tall grass can be found in the Great Plains of the u.s
    8·2 answers
  • The ____________ was the first Muslim civil war.
    10·2 answers
  • What did lord dunmore do that horrified many southerners?.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!