That statement is True.
In a win-lose negotiation, the end result will definitely resulted in a poositive outcome for one party while creating a negative outcome for another.
In competing for a resource that is really scarce, it is very UNlikely that both party want to settle and divide the scarce resource.
When you've carefully checked all the facts and your attitudes and still find that there's "just something" about your supervisor that's causing a problem in your relationship, you should suspect that there's a hidden attitude.
Answer:
D all of the above
Explanation:
Heredity, Nature, and instinct can affect personality and social behavior. Heredity, birth order, parents, and the cultural environment are among the principal factors that social scientists see influencing personality and behavior.
False because they have to help other people as well
2013 in the dark side of ethics is this an example of interpreting rules without attention to overreaching values.
Each of us has encountered coworkers who engage in dubious activity yet believe they are doing morally and occasionally even consider their actions to be outstanding. We do not mean clearly unethical activity that is justified (such as one psychologist who billed Medicare for hundreds of thousands of dollars for services never delivered, but then explained that he was such a concerned healer that he did not have time to attend to the details of billing). Instead, we're talking about instances where psychologists consciously think they're acting morally.
To know more about work ethics :
brainly.com/question/28584518
#SPJ4