United States participation in the ICC treaty regime would also be unconstitutional because it would allow the trial of U.S. citizens for crimes committed on U.S. soil, which are otherwise entirely within the judicial power of the United States.
Answer:
There are several reasons why we might oppose to the annexation of Hawaii by the United States government. Some of this could be:
The fact that all people and nations have the right to govern themselves. Hawaiians deserve to make their own decisions.
The deposition of Queen Liliuokalani was forceful, and did not follow democratic or legal procedures.
A treaty of friendship, as existed originally, already gives the United States many privileges in terms of trade.
The economy of Hawaii was already very integrated to that of the United States.
A new state in the country represents a significant expense for the federal government.
By 285 CE the Roman Empire<span> had grown so vast that it was no longer feasible to govern all the provinces from the central seat of </span>Rome<span>. The Emperor Diocletian </span>divided<span> the </span>empire into<span> halves with the </span>Eastern Empire<span> governed out of Byzantium (later Constantinople) and then </span>Western Empire<span> governed from </span>Rome<span>.</span>
<span>King is disappointed with the white moderate churches because they want him to wait patiently and keep order even if that means suffering from injustice.</span>
