I believe the answer to this is "true." Really, all conclusions on all events are subjective. But considering history, conclusions on events are especially prone to subjectivity. Consider who writes the history books. If one country wins a war against another country, they will write about themselves as the noble party and portray the enemy as villainous. However, this may not be the real case. This occurs much more than we think, and we must research different events to make sure we are not blindly buying into what people say. Hope this helps.
Answer:
- a journal entry written by a professor who is considered an expert.
- a report written by an independent government source.
- a document published by a renowned organization.
- a scientific paper put out by a non-profit organization.
Explanation:
Hope this helps you :)
Answer:
- It makes the narrator seem disciplined.
Explanation:
Diction or word-choice always plays a vital role in creating the intended picture, tone, or mood through vivid descriptions and details. It assists the author to leave the desired impact on the audience and elicit an intended response from them.
In the given excerpt, the words or diction express the idea that 'makes the narrator look disciplined.' <u>The words like 'hoped', 'asked'. 'found the dugout', and the words he uses to describe others like 'the major was a little man, he was too kind', etc. imply that the narrator is a systematic and orderly man</u>.
