1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
2 years ago
7

Select all that apply to the U.S. South after 1820:

History
1 answer:
Misha Larkins [42]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Agriculturally-Based

Mostly rural living

Mostly Democrat/pro-slavery

Average person had less wealth

You might be interested in
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
The Democratic Party today is generally considered more liberal than the Republican Party because its members and elected offici
ANTONII [103]
The second answer is correct.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is an increase in competition likely to do to the demand?
Colt1911 [192]
More versions of the same product will be out on the market, some may fail, leaving two or three different brands behind.
7 0
3 years ago
While justices for the Florida Supreme Court serve a single 6-year term, federal judges serve terms that are how long?
Novay_Z [31]
A for life during good behavior
8 0
3 years ago
Use the excerpt to answer the question.
tatuchka [14]

What best captures George H. W. Bush’s description of the power of the United States in 1991 is "a fierce rival against formidable foes". Option B. This is further explained below.

<h3>Who is George H. W. Bush?</h3>

Generally, George Herbert Walker Bush was the 41st President of the United States of America and was instrumental in the building of America as we know it.

In conclusion,  The phrase "a ferocious opponent against strong enemies" best conveys George H. W. Bush's view of the United States' might in 1991.

Read more about George H. W. Bush

brainly.com/question/16307611

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is the United States’ largest transfer payment program?
    11·1 answer
  • What event sparked the beginning of world war ii?
    6·1 answer
  • Type of democracy where citizens are involved in day to day government
    5·1 answer
  • What is the maasai believed
    13·1 answer
  • In a socialist economy, how are the basic problems of scarcity and allocation of limited resources addressed?
    7·1 answer
  • An astrolabe is a device used by navigators to determine latitude based on the position of stars.
    11·1 answer
  • According to the US Constitution, all American citizens have the right to life, liberty, and property. These rights are known as
    14·2 answers
  • Why did panama create a free trade zone at the northern end of the panama canal?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best explains how the undermining of the Geneva Accords and the use of military advisers in So
    14·1 answer
  • The court case Constantin Brancusi v. United States determined that ____________ was a piece of art, and not a kitchen utensil a
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!