The author of the story is implicating that this person is a “hard lump of clay” or a “hard glinty coal” in the sentenc. Notice how in both of these examples they mention the word hard, and an object that is dull. They <em>could</em> be saying that this person was hard to befrend, talk to or whatever the content is and that they seem like a dull person.
For example, let’s call them Henry.
”Henry was a hard person to get to know, he was always very dull.”
Answer: B
Explanation: When Harrison said he was the end of the authority.
Answer:
Today I have a conditional of humble feelings. I make a spontaneous decision in my venerable believe of better life. The result was girded and almost good. My sustain makes haunches.
Explanation:
It is simple!
Well basically the just changed because overtime the meaning of words have changed. The way we talk and our context clues have shifted because some things from back then don't mean the same as they do now an example of this would be heartburn now it means that a pain in your heart from possibly to much grease, back then it was a way to describe jealousy. It is easy to understand the reading always through context clues! When you use the words around what you are reading the meaning of the word can change to what the author wanted it to mean! I think it only changed because people change and they make everything else that they say mean what they want. It also helps with the development of technology that we can edit text and use sights to help generalize words so that other people see the words how we want them to.