Answer:
Criticizing the government was considered unpatriotic in the United States during World War I
Explanation:
During the World War I, government were taking many steps to engaged people and distracting them the war activities. The federal government put forth several different laws/campaigns to increase patriotism. This include food rationing campaigns, encouraging women to join the work force which were taking by the people as negative activity of the government.
This war lasted for about 52 months and it was a life-changing experience for the generation of that time.
The reconstruction plan, developed at a meeting of the participating European states, was drafted on June 5, 1947. It offered the same aid to the Soviet Union and its allies, but they refused to accept it,[8][9] as doing so would allow a degree of US control over the communist economies.[10] In fact, the Soviet Union prevented its satellite states (i.e., East Germany, Poland, etc.) from accepting. Secretary Marshall became convinced Stalin had no interest in helping restore economic health in Western Europe.<span>[11]</span>
The correct answer is "required all goods imported into Britain or the colonies to be shipped in British vessels."
The Navigation Act of 1651 required all goods imported into Britain or the colonies to be shipped in British vessels.
The English Navigation Acts acts heavily taxed goods shipped in the southern colonies and countries other than England.
The English monarchy wanted to exert control over the 13 colonies and get some funds to pay the debts of war, by collecting taxes. There were many taxes in those years. But specifically, the Navigation Acts were a series of English laws that controlled shipping and trade from the English colonies to other countries, limiting the participation of foreign people in commerce with the colonies. The Navigation Acts were passed in 1663, 1673, and 1696.
Answer: The Mexican-American War was waged mostly by federal Army volunteers. Although this may not seem like a constitutional issue, it reflected debates about military power that were banked into the constitutional and the interaction of Article I's Army and Militia clauses.
Explanation: Give me the brainiest
