Answer:
Explanation:
In fiction, 'internal conflict' refers to a character's internal struggle. A character might struggle with an emotional problem such as fear of intimacy or abandonment, for example. ... External conflict, on the other hand, refers to the conflicts between a character and external forces.In fiction, 'internal conflict' refers to a character's internal struggle. A character might struggle with an emotional problem such as fear of intimacy or abandonment, for example. ... External conflict, on the other hand, refers to the conflicts between a character and external forces.In fiction, 'internal conflict' refers to a character's internal struggle. A character might struggle with an emotional problem such as fear of intimacy or abandonment, for example. ... External conflict, on the other hand, refers to the conflicts between a character and external forces.In fiction, 'internal conflict' refers to a character's internal struggle. A character might struggle with an emotional problem such as fear of intimacy or abandonment, for example. ... External conflict, on the other hand, refers to the conflicts between a character and external forces.
The Design of my planet would look just like earth but maybe the planet would be a bit smaller because I'm paranoid and do not like big spaces.
The laws would be:
No Killing
No Stealing
No Harming
No Lying
No being Mean
Please mark brainliest
Have a good day.
The answer is A. Kotowski cites four scholars who specialize in the study of volcanoes, whereas Ferguson cites only the encyclopedia.
The given thesis is arguing that Kotowski is more reliable than Ferguson because he backs up his statements with a greater number of more reliable sources. In choice A, Kotowski is not only using three more sources than Ferguson, but they're sources from reputable specialists, making them higher quality sources as well.
If you're still confused, you can use elimination to rule out the others:
B. B doesn't work because there's no mention of the rate of volcanic change in the thesis. Although the statement may be true, it's not evidence to support the writer's claim.
C. C doesn't work because there's no mention of the frequency of volcanic eruption in the thesis. Again, although the statement may be true, it doesn't necessarily support the writer's claim.
D. D doesn't work because there's no mention of the similarities between the two pieces. If the thesis is arguing that Kotowski's work is different from Ferguson's because it's more reliable, it'd be counterproductive for the writer to mention the similarities of the work. Therefore, this "evidence" has no relation to the thesis and would not support the author's thesis.
Hope this helps!
The answer to your question is D. All of the above. This is the correct answer because Hurston's use of bothe race's language shows that she is respectful to both races and wants to have an accurate perspective by using both languages. Hope this helped!
Answer:
I think a good topic could be of people, or literally any two different subjects
Explanation:
I think in order for somebody to help you, which we would really love, you have to post the entire question? :)
