Answer:
Option A, buys dollars to raise the exchange rate, is the right answer.
Explanation:
Option A is correct because when the Fed will buy the dollars then only the demand for dollars will shift rightwards. Consequently, the dollar price or exchange rate will go up. Therefore, the Fed will buy the dollars to increase the exchange rate. In another case, if the Fed wants to decrease the exchange rate then it will sell the dollars, and selling of dollars will shift the supply rightwards. Thus, the exchange rate will fall.
Answer:
The correct answer is Formal Benchmarking.
Explanation:
The English term "benchmark" comes from the words "bench" (bench, table) and "mark" (brand, sign). In the original meaning of English, the word compound could however be translated as a measure of quality. In other words, benchmarking is a way to determine how well a company performs, compared to others.
In order to be more competitive at present, it is necessary to use benchmarking since it provides strategies that allow identifying the best keys to the company's success, so that by implementing them the organization can be a leading and competitive company in a changing market and global in which business organizations currently have to see each other.
The majority of authors relate benchmarking with competitiveness and business improvement, being "the company" its natural scope. However, the potential benefits of its use make it considered in other areas, such as "public organizations", and at other levels, "sectoral" and "environment" (regional, national and international). This complicates the definition of the concept, since it is a tool that has multiple application possibilities, pursues different objectives in each case, and uses its own methodology in each area.
Answer:
The need for organisations (which may be governmental or non-governmental) to improve the condition of living of people and protect their environment whilst they pursue increased profitability has been termed
The Triple Bottomline.
It is also referred to by economists as the 3P - People, Planet and Profit.
It speaks to the fact that other than the usual making financial success the sole metric of measurement by which organisations are evaluated, their impact on people and the environment should be considered as well.
In simple terms, a firm should be termed more successful than others if it's activities besides being profitable also impacts positively on people and protects if not improves the environment.
Cheers!
Answer:
The present value of the annuity is $73,091.50
Explanation:
Use the following formula to calculate the present value of the annuity
Present value of annuity = ( Annuity Payment x Annuity factor for first 6 years ) + [ ( Annuity Payment x Annuity factor for after 6 years ) x Present value factor for 6 years ]
Where
Annuity Payment = $1,000
Annuity factor for first 6 years = 1 - ( 1 + 16%/12 )^-(6x12) / 16%/12 = 46.10028344
Annuity factor for after 6 years = 1 - ( 1 + 13%/12 )^-((17-6)x12) / 13%/12 = 70.0471029820
Present value factor for 6 years = ( 1 + 16%/12)^-(6x12) = 0.385329554163
Placing values in the formula
Present value of annuity = ( $1,000 x 46.10028344 ) + [ ( $1,000 x 70.0471029820 ) x 0.385329554163 ]
Present value of annuity = $46,100.28 + $26,991.22
Present value of annuity = $73,091.50
Answer:
Manson will incur a loss of $10,300 by buying the part.
Explanation:
Purchases = 10,300 * $6 = $61,800
Variable cost = 10,300 * $5 = $51,500
Fixed cost = 10,300 * $3 = $30,900
Analysis:
<u>Details Make ($) Buy ($) Net ($)
</u>
Purchase 0 61,800 61,800
Variable 51,500 0 51,500
Fixed 30,900 30,900 <u> 0 </u>
Loss <u> 10,300 </u>
Therefore, Manson will incur a loss of $10,300 by buying the part.
