Answer:
From Greece--the principles of democracy have been brought into the US government from Greece. Greek democracy was limited as it was in the founding of the US. Only elite, men were allowed the rights of citizens in both governments.
From the Byzantine Empire--the principles of law and order came from Justinian's Code. The law code set high level law principles with each law corresponding to a punishment. The codes also set judicial principles used by the US when setting up their judicial branch of government.
From Rome--representative government was used where members of the empire were elected or chosen to represent larger populations. In Rome, this ensured the reaches of the empire were heard and in the US representation has been used to ensure the voices of states and the people are heard in at the federal level.
The Justinian Code, implemented about 1500 years ago, totally changed the Roman Empire. It brought together existing laws and codes in one place, becoming the sole authority for law in Justinian's time. It included the laws and details on legal terms and information for students studying law. It not only directed law in the Byzantine Empire, but also influenced the Roman Catholic Church's ideas about law, and in turn, many of the laws in western nations are based partially on ancient Roman laws. According to Justinian Code, a person is innocent until proven guilty. Sound familiar? This is just one example of how the Justinian Code influenced modern laws.
Answer: What were the three key elements of the Catholic Reformation, and why were they so important to the Catholic Church in the 16th century? The founding of the Jesuits, Reform of the papacy, and the Council of Trent. They were important because they unified the church, help spread the gospel, and validated the church.
Explanation:
Dred Scott decision, formally <span>Dred Scott v. John F.A. Sandford</span>, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, ruled (7–2) that a slave (Dred Scott) who had resided in a free state and territory (where slavery was prohibited) was not thereby entitled to his freedom; that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States; and that the Missouri Compromise (1820), which had declared free all territories west of Missouri and north of latitude 36°30′, was unconstitutional. The decision added fuel to the sectional controversy and pushed the country closer to civil war.
Among constitutional scholars, Scott v. Sandford is widely considered the worst decision ever rendered by the Supreme Court. It has been cited in particular as the most egregious example in the court’s history of wrongly imposing a judicial solution on a political problem. A later chief justice, Charles Evans Hughes, famously characterized the decision as the court’s great “self-inflicted wound.”
Answer:
The monarch was able to maintain absolute control over the society with the addition of feudalism