Answer:
Correct answer is a. nationalism.
Explanation:
Correct answer is A as it is a way how they wanted to create a national state, that will be free from influence of other empires that were surrounding them.
B is not correct as communism was an idea that spread across Russia during WW1.
C and D are not correct as imperialism and militarism were policies that were led by greatest European forces such as Germany.
Market demands. the free market demands fair trade.
Answer:
d.the symmetry heuristic
Explanation:
George Pólya was one of the founders of the heuristics who was a Hungarian mathematician during 1945.
Heuristic: The term heuristic is defined as a mental shortcut that is being used by human beings for problem-solving, discovery or learning that utilizes a practical method that is not guaranteed as perfect or optimal yet considered as sufficient for the immediate or required goals.
Symmetry heuristic: The term symmetry heuristic is defined as the process in which human beings think of buildings, shapes as more symmetrical than the reality of them.
In the question above, the given statement states the significance of the symmetry heuristics.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
I believe the answer is: Common underlying principles
Common underlying principles refer to the standard set of mind that we commonly use to approach a certain problem.
If an individual is used to look everything that happen in his/life postiively, that individual would less likely to develop suicidal thought regardless of his/her problems.
