1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ann [662]
2 years ago
11

Explain one way in which alliances contributed to World War II.​

History
1 answer:
AlladinOne [14]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Sure.

Explanation:

After the invasion of Poland, the establishment of <em>alliances contributed</em> to the outbreak of World War II since it led to France and Britain declaring war on Germany.

You might be interested in
What is the connection between dharma and jati?
Arlecino [84]

Answer:

Although the lawgivers of the traditional Hindu codes (Dharma-shastras) themselves tend to treat jati s as varna s (social classes) and try to account on other occasions for jati s as products of alliances between the four varna s (Brahmans, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras) and their descendants, a sharp distinction should be made between jati as a limited regional endogamous group of families and varna as a universal all-Indian model of social class.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Christopher Columbus was an Italian explorer. What motivated him to find a westward sea route from Europe to Asia? Did he reach
Lina20 [59]
The Asian islands near China and India were fabled for their spices and gold, making them an attractive destination for Europeans. In other words, I believe that motivated him. No, he did not. He thought he had reached Asia, but it was actually America. Well the Spanish goal seemed to be to kill as many Taíno as possible, so Columbus did not treat them well, none of the Spaniards did.

Hope this helps, please mark brainliest!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the difference in separation of powers and checks and balances?
Andreyy89

Answer for your first question:

  • Separation of powers refers to each branch of government having their own distinct powers, while checks and balances refers to the ability of each branch to prevent another branch from becoming too powerful.

For your second question:

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/8033338#readmore

<em>[Proper form on Brainly is to ask just one question per post.]</em>

<u>Explanation in regard to your first question:</u>

The "separation of powers" principle was an idea embedded into the plans for American government by our founding fathers, based on their reading of Enlightenment political theory.  The terminology "separation of powers" was introduced by Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron of Montesquieu.  (Usually he's referred to as just "Montesquieu.")  He wrote an important work of political theory called <em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>, published in 1748.

Within his treatment of how governments will function best, Montesquieu argued that executive, legislative, and judicial functions of government ought to be divided between parts of the government, so that no one person or division of the government can infringe on the overall rights of others in the government or of the members of the society overall.  The framers of the United States Constitution embedded the separation of powers into the plan for US government.

As noted by <em>The History Channel, </em> "In addition to this separation of powers, the framers built a system of checks and balances designed to guard against tyranny by ensuring that no branch would grab too much power."  Some examples of the checks and balances used would be:

  • Congress (the Legislative Branch) controls the government's budget, so the Executive Branch needs Congress's support to fund any of its desired initiatives.
  • The President nominates federal officials, but those nominations must be confirmed by the Senate.
  • The President has the ability to veto laws passed by Congress, requiring a two-thirds majority to override his veto.
  • The Supreme Court and other federal courts (the Judicial Branch of government) can rule that laws passed by Congress or executive orders by the President are unconstitutional, blocking their implementation.
3 0
3 years ago
What is the purpose of the underlined sentences in the passage?
Xelga [282]
The answer to this is C.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the causes of England's population growth in the 1800s and what consequences do you think
Tom [10]

The major causes of population growth in England during the 1800s was due to the decline in mortality rate and the introduction  if New crops such as potatoes

<h3>Population growth and its Effect in England in the 19th Century </h3>

The Population of great Britain at the start of the 19th century was about 10 Million.

This was as a result of the low mortality rate occasioned by low death rate and introduction of new crops

   Population growth accelerated and had a market-expanding effect to a large extent and hence triggering the industrial revolution.

learn more about Population growth at brainly.com/question/1437549

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Beauties and gentlebeauties...Please help...;-;
    7·2 answers
  • Was the sand bar saloon built in the middle of canadian river
    15·2 answers
  • What group began the “Jail, no bail” tactic?
    15·2 answers
  • A black woman, , refused to give up her seat to a white passenger, setting off the Montgomery bus boycott.
    12·2 answers
  • What physical feature dominated the incan empire
    12·2 answers
  • What was one result of nativist fears of new immigrants?
    15·1 answer
  • ANSWER CORRECTLY!
    15·1 answer
  • 2 Points
    7·2 answers
  • List several reasons why Mecca is an important city to Islam
    11·1 answer
  • The federal reserve is given the authority to take over a private bank tjat cannot cover the loans given out to its borrowers fe
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!