<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
The Scopes Trial, formally known as The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes and regularly alluded to as the Scopes Monkey Trial, was an American legitimate case in July 1925 in which a substitute secondary teacher, John T. Extensions, was blamed for abusing Tennessee's Butler Act.
The Fundamentalist– Modernist contention is a noteworthy break that started during the 1920s and '30s inside the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America. At issue were fundamental debate about the job of Christianity, the specialist of Scripture, the passing, Resurrection, and making up penance of Jesus.
The Scopes-Monkey Trial was a broadly advanced conflict among fundamentalists and innovators. Fundamentalists passed laws in schools that rendered the instructing of advancement illicit. A pioneer - John Scopes- - overstepped this profoundly fundamentalist law and instructed development to his understudies. For this he was arraigned. In spite of the fact that the preliminary was a fundamentalist triumph - Scopes was discovered liable - innovators would at present battle for their entitlement to show development and science as opposed to religion-based creation legends.
Answer:
the would force lavbor and have brutal punsihments
Explanation:
The emperors of ancient China had tremendous power and responsibility. Called the 'Son of Heaven', he (and once she) was given a divine right to rule over all people but was expected to promote their best interest and not his own. An absolute monarch, although in practice dependent on an inner circle of advisors, the mystique of the emperor was enhanced by his invisibility to ordinary people, secluded as he often was in the imperial palace. To gain a personal audience with the emperor, even if he still remained hidden behind a screen while he sat on his golden dragon throne, was the highest of honours. Perhaps no other ancient ruler was ever as remote or as revered as the Emperor of China.
Mandate of Heaven
The rulers of the Western Zhou dynasty were the first to take the traditional Chinese worship of ancestors a step further and carry the title 'Son of Heaven' (Tianzi). King Wen of the Zhou, c. 1050 BCE, claimed he, and, as it conveniently tuned out, all of his successors too, had been given the right to rule by the gods (either Heaven or Sky). This was nothing less than a Mandate of Heaven or Tianming, that is, an unchallengeable right to govern. Not actually divine but, rather, ruling on behalf of the gods on earth, the role also carried the great responsibility to take decisions for the good of the people. If he did not rule well, then China would suffer terrible disasters such as floods and droughts and he would lose the right to govern. This was also a useful explanation as to why ruling dynasties changed over the centuries: they had lost the blessing of heaven through misrule.
B because they thought the treaty was unfit for the Germans and what they did
<h2>Answer:</h2>
<u>The term "</u><u>Production possibility </u><u>Frontier" (or Curve) is a diagram showing the maximum amount of goods and/or services an economy can produce.</u>
<h2>Explanation:</h2>
The production possibility curves is a hypothetical representation of the amount of two different goods. This is a curve depicting all maximum output possibilities for two goods. In other words production possibility curve measures the maximum output of two goods using a fixed amount of input.
I think this was John Adams
