Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The relations between the Cuban Republic and the United States of America built during the eighteenth century through illicit trade. The Cuban Republic was the most prosperous trading partner at the time. It was also the center of the production of tobacco and sugar. This build economic ties between the Cuban Republic and Americans.
<u>The Spanish-American War was originated with the rebellion of Cuba for independence from Spain. The war started between the Us and Spain in 1898. This rebellion made Americans anxious that the investments that they have made might be in danger</u>.
So, the answer is true.
The answer is A, the national and state governments share power.
The correct option is BRITAIN DID NOT WANT TRADE WITH COLONIES TO ENRICH ITS COMPETITORS.
Mercantilism is a form of economy policy which was designed to maximize the trade status of Britain and ultimately to increase the wealth of the nation. The policy encourage exporting of goods but discourages importing. Also, the policy forbid the colonies from trading with other nations.
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
