Does Zinn offer a convincing argument

1 answer:

5 0

Howard Zinn Howard Zinn’s argument on the nature of the American War for Independence was the war for independence was not a social revolution. Instead, he argues the colonial elite used the war for their own personal gain in power and status. The wealthy.

You might be interested in

List 2 actions of Andrew Jackson that supported Indian Removal?

kiruha [24]

Answer:

The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy.

Explanation:

What does Jackson name as the advantages of the Indian Removal Act for the United States? Native American removal would reduce conflict between the federal and state governments. It would allow white settlers to occupy more of the South and the West, presumably protecting from foreign invasion.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Many people who immigrated to the United States during the Gilded Age moved to

Semmy [17]

Many people who immigrated to the United States during the Gilded Age moved to...

Urban areas, where they worked in factories.

You see, many businesses opened factories in urban areas, creating jobs, so immigrants moved to these areas in order to work for these new companies.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Where was the Mughal empire located?