Answer: Lenski would note that Richard’s high income but low occupational prestige demonstrates a condition of STATUS INCONSISTENCY.
Explanation: As the word inconsistency means an incompatibility between two propositions. Status inconsistency is defined as a situation whereby an individual's social position is incompatible with their social status. An example is given in the question, a janitor usually is associated with low pay. When a janitor is associated with high pay, it is termed status inconsistency. Because the social position is not compatible with the social standard.
When individuals experience status inconsistency, their likely choice of behaviiur is to claim the higher status.
Answer:
D. rebuttal
Explanation:
After the defendant's attorney has finished calling witnesses, the plaintiff's attorney can call witnesses and put forth evidence to rebut the defendant's case. This is called a <u>rebuttal</u>. Rebuttal is the argument a plaintiff's attorney makes to weaken the case of the defense counsel. It involves the presentation of evidences to contradict or nullify whatever point or submissions that have been made by the defense attorney.
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer: these staggering number of results of decades of changes in childbearing and mortality patterns
Explanation:
