Answer:
The Communist would have been defeated
Explanation:
The Communist Party in China can comfortably say thank you to the Japanese because if it wasn't for their occupation, the Communists would have been destroyed. The Japanese attacked and invaded the parts of China that had the most resources and the most population, which accidentally was actually the home-ground of the Nationalists. The Japanese managed to weaken the Nationalist to such a degree that once they left, the Nationalist were relatively easily overtaken by the Communists. If Japan didn't invaded though, the Nationalist would have crushed the Communist, and the main reasons for that are that the Nationalists had much more resources, larger military forces, better equipment, and were much better off economically.
The appropriate answer is B. steam boats could travel against the current on a river. This statement means that steam boats could travel upstream. The steam engine in steam boats allowed them to travel upstream possibly against a strong current. Sail boats rely on wind or the downstream flow of the water to move it from one location to the other. The invention of the steamboat revolutionised transportation of goods and people on large navigable rivers.
During WWI, twosocialists, Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer handed out fliers in which they stated that the draft was violating the Thirteenth Amendment by obliging citizens to go to war against their will, or in other words, to oblige them to involuntary servitude.
These activitists thought that the First Amendment, which guarantees citizen's rights such as the freedom of speech would protect them. Their case ended up being discussed by the US Supreme Court, which decided that the First Amendment does not confer the right to complain against the war effort or to obstruct the draft.
The range of offences that are considered a crime are stated in the Espionage Act of 1917 and The Sedition Act of 1918, which extended the first.
Holmes was part of the Supreme Court judges who decided in the Schenck case. He introduced the concept of "clear and present danger", that should be tested to determine under which circumstances limits should be placed the First Amendment freedoms: assembly, press and speech.
His position is clear when he tries to implement mechanisms that can circumvent the universal civil rights that all citizens should enjoy according to the Constitution. There should be no limits to those freedoms, as it is the same as not guaranteeing them.
Answer:Romulus and Remus
Explanation: hope this helps
Elizabeth I died on March 24, 1603, the final ruler from the House of Tudor. She was succeeded by King James VI of Scotland, the son of Mary, Queen of Scots. His ascension to the throne signified the end of the reign of the House of Tudor and ushered in the era of the House of Stuart.
