Answer:
Proactive interference.
Explanation:
What the exercise is exemplifying about is "Proactive interference" which is, as it's name indicates, an interference of our memory. When we are looking for a particular word, moment, etc., using our memory, sometimes we find a newer memory that intereferes, that confuses us for a moment. This is what is called proactive interference, and a very good example of that is what occurs to Deanna: she studied Spanish in high school and now, probably years later, she studies French. But, when attempting to do so, she confuses some words with Spanish words.
The primary lever to reduce cycle inventory is simply to reduce the lot sizes of items moving in the supply chain. However, making such reductions in Q without making any other changes can be devastating.
The answer is: D. Rebellion. Rebellion is a term that describes an inequality or difference, as in rank, amount, or quality. It is also a type of an anomie theory that occurs when individuals decline or not accept certain culturally valued means and goals.
Answer:
Hi, you haven't provided the options to the question, so I will just give the answer in my own words and you can check with the options.
Answer is NEGLIGENCE.
Explanation:
A duty of care is a legal responsibility of a person or organization to avoid any behaviours or omissions that could reasonably be foreseen to cause harm to others. For example, a sports administrator, sporting organizations, administrators and facility managers usually have a duty of care to participants to take reasonable care to ensure that safe playing surfaces are provided.
Duty of care is the first element that must be established to proceed with an action in negligence.
Negligence is defined as a failure to exercise the care that a reasonable prudent person would have done in the same circumstances.
Therefore, according to the question, the neglect or failure to fulfill in a just and proper manner the duties of care of a recreation or sports service provider is known as NEGLIGENCE.
Answer:
A. Jack is making a(n) <u>internal attribution</u> about his girlfriend's behavior, whereas John is making a(n) <u>external attribution</u>.
Explanation:
An internal attribution refers to a situation in which <u>an individual uses a personal reason to explain the outcome of a situation</u>. For example, a specific behavior is the result of the person's personality.
On the other hand, an external attribution refers to the situation when <u>the individual attributes a result to an external situation or environmental factor</u>, not to the person's characteristics. For example, when you fail an exam and you blame an external factor, such as the teacher or the weather.
In this case, <u>Jack is making an internal attribution</u> about his girlfriend's behavior because he thinks she broke up with him because she is selfish; whereas <u>John is making an external attribution</u> because he thinks his girlfriend broke up with him because she had a family emergency to attend.
