1.) characters get intorduced: this is important for the overal story and some of the struggles/hopes of the kids.
2.) T.J tells the kids about the man being burnt: the kids didnt know this because their mother wanted to protect them from that knowledge, but T.J's mouth runs like water, so he scared Little Man and Christopher John.
3.) Jeremy joins the kids on their walk to school even though he gets in trouble for it: this shows that unlike his family, who are racist to the core, jeremy is a good kid who just likes the Logan family, despite them being black.
4.) Cassie and Little man, who are sharing a classroom despite their grade differences, are given books that are worn out and dirty, and we see the pride in both little man and cassie, which plays a huge role throughout the book.
5.)Cassie goes to talk to her mother about her and little man getting a whipping because they didnt accept he books: their teacher, mrs.crocker, has already confronted the kids mother and their mom just takes the books and begins to fix them. covering the work "Nigra" with a piece of paper and some glue, she makes the books less offensive because she wants her kids to have an education.
6.) Both cassie and little man's pride prevented them from taking the books. this shows that even though it was really hard for african americans to get an education at that time, they were willing to risk it then be called offensive words and given dirty old books
REALLY HOPE THIS HELPSS!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
you cant change your username
The response provided considers the appeal to logic, to character, and to emotion in the analysis, as expressed in options A, B, and C and explained below.
<h3>What is a rhetorical appeal?</h3>
A rhetorical appeal is a strategy used in order to convince one's audience of something. There are three possible appeals we can use to persuade our audience:
- Appeal to logic or logos.
- Appeal to character/credibility or ethos.
- Appeal to emotion or pathos.
The sample response provided in the instructions takes all the appeals into consideration when analyzing John Muir's statement. Let's break it down here:
- He appeals to logic by giving evidence about the destruction. - Appeal to logic.
- He seems very credible because he knows about the history of individual trees. - Appeal to character.
- Finally, he makes readers want to save the trees by using strong emotional language throughout. - Appeal to emotion.
Therefore, we can select options A, B, and C as the correct answers for this question.
Learn more about rhetorical appeals here:
brainly.com/question/13734134
#SPJ1
Well, i guess he would be considered a good person. He was just trying to be nice about not letting the girl go up in the plane.
But when she still does it, he doesn't flip right away and still calm
hope this helps
