Modus Ponens for the statement is, " Recession will be there in the economy next year." A syllogism is "there is a decline in economic activity hence every economy would be in recession next year".
<u>Explanation
</u>
- Modus Ponens is the rule of inference or rule of logic in which there are one premise and consequent results of the premise. There is a conditional statement which means that if an event 1 happens then event 2 would happen and if event 1 happens then event 2 would be inferred as the consequent result. For instance, If A connotes B and A is considered to be true then obviously by the rule of Modus Ponens B is also true.
- A syllogism is deductive reasoning where inference is drawn after assessing two other ideas or premises. For instance, all men can speak therefore Tom can also speak. The premises is all men can speak and Tom speaks and the conclusion is ll men speak and hence Tom can also speak.
- In the above sentence, the economy will be in recession next year the Modus Ponens is Recession will be there in every economy next year. There is one premise which is The economy will be in recession and the consequent premise is that recession will be there in the economy. Syllogism revolves around two premises and one conclusion, therefore, the economy is premise number one and every economy is premise number two Therefore the conclusion is as above.
Answer: its the past of forbear...
forbear means politely or patiently restrain an impulse to do something; refrain
The use of more technology will maybe block out what is around us and make us more like robots than the humans we are now.
Europeans turned to Africa as a source of enslaved persons because they were used to the heat, they knew how to farm, and they were immune to European diseases.
Answer:
Explanation:
You sort of have to combine the feeling Thoreau had about nature, individuality, spirituality and civil disobedience to get the idea what he would have thought about war.
He would oppose war with every fiber of his being.
To him, war was a reflection of what was the worst in mankind. There is no nobility in war. Spirituality would especially oppose it, since in his mind spirituality meant serving what is above your head without compensation of any kind (and that last includes things that you would never think of).
Civil disobedience would dictate action of some kind. Vietnam and Civil Rights were not the only things being upheld by people who were transcendentalists by nature. Not participating in society at all would have been something Thoreau would have agreed with.
War would have been at the very bottom of those activities he would have upheld and civil disobedience would have been his first response to governments that have run amok in his mind. The ideas contained in Walden would be confirmed in the evil of the civil war.
Anyway, the book reflects many of the key Transcendentalist themes, including the importance of individualism, the necessity of maintaining a connection to nature, and spirituality.
