It seems like the answer is B. throughout the story, we can see that Amak is very passionate about getting food for his family to eat. A seems unlikely as even though the end of the story shows references to him crying, it doesn’t contribute to the main idea of the story. C and D seem unlikely for the same reason.
i hope i was able to help!
Answer:
Deductive argument.
Explanation:
A deductive argument can be defined as a type of argument that begins with a factual statement to draw a conclusion. It is a factual and logical reasoning. This argument states that if the premises are true that the conclusion drawn must be true as well.
It applies a 'top-bottom' principle which means that first general statements are made then these statements are narrowed to reach the conclusion.
<u>In the given statement, two premises are stated either Jack can enroll in full-time school or buy a car. Then the statement got narrowed when he thought to enroll in a full-time school than buying a car. Then the conclusion drawn was that he had to put off buying the car</u>.
So, the correct answer is deductive reasoning.
answer: i think it's a complex compound
explanation: i dont know i could be wrong
Hey hun, they are 3 different meanings for Talons.
a claw, especially one belonging to a bird of prey.
the part of a bolt against which the key presses to slide it in a lock.
(in various card games) the cards that have not yet been dealt.
its orgin,
late Middle English (denoting any heel-like part or object): from Old French, literally ‘heel’, from Latintalus‘ankle bone, heel
Hope it helps
The past tense of squeeze is squeezed.
I hope this helps!
