Answer:
A graph gives numeric evidence visually or a graph is colorful and will engage the reader.
Explanation:
It honestly could be neither of those but i just assumed it was because the author might be using visuals to grab the reader's attention or it could be to help them visualize what's going on.
Cuz they did when the fighting started so turmoil went out like crazy
The correct answer is Henryk Ross.
Henryk Ross had a much more privileged life in the ghetto than Esther Brunstein because he was a photographer for the German army. Therefore, he could live more comfortably, safe and get more food.
Moreover, as Henryk was a photographer, he was in charge of producing propaganda and identity photos for the Department of Statistics in Lodz Ghetto (in Poland). He could access to film and other processing facilities in the ghetto that he used to document the living conditions and the suffering of the Jews there, secretly.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached or further references, we can comment on the following general terms.
English practices against invasions and encroachments would determine policies against and perception of Native Americans in the Americas.
In general terms, the relationship between Native American Indians and white English settlers was bad. Continuing differences were the cause of difficult and even battles between them. The French, who were not really interested in settling territories, just wanted to make money with the fur trade, had a much better relationship with Native American Indian tribes.
After the Pontiac's War of 1763, the English monarchy ordered to stop the invasion and occupation of Indian territories. That is why, at the end of the French and Indian War, Great Britain established the Proclamation of 1763.
I think it is the last one, because revolutions are connected with the need for better treatment and living conditions.
