1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IgorLugansk [536]
3 years ago
8

What happened as a result of the kansas-nebraska act's provision for popular sovereignty?

History
2 answers:
Kazeer [188]3 years ago
5 0
<span>a violent clash between proslavery and antislavery forces</span>
9966 [12]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

a violent clash between pro slavery and antislavery forces.

Explanation:

The idea that people from new territories would vote on slavery cause problems very quickly. Both sides started showing up in Kansas and a violent wave was the result of it. Things escalated to a point that things seemed out of control. Pro-slavery people burned the settlement of Lawrence, Kansas and John Brown and his abolitionist group murdered a pro-slavery man.

You might be interested in
Compare the Parliamentary and Presidential forms of Government with reference to India and the U.S.A.​
Ksivusya [100]

The presidential system selects a head of government independently of the legislature, while in contrast, the head of government in a parliamentary system answers directly to the legislature. Presidential systems necessarily operate under the regulations of separation of powers, while parliamentary methods do not.

<h3>What is the presidential state of government give an example?</h3>

A presidential system is a method of government where a head of government is also head of state and shows an executive branch that is different from the legislative branch. The United States, for instance, has a presidential system.

<h3>What is the difference of parliamentary and presidential?</h3>

In a parliamentary form of government, the powers are divided between the little head and the real head of the state. In a presidential form of government on the other hand the forces are concentrated in the hands of the single executive or the President of the nation.

To learn more about presidential system, refer

brainly.com/question/15453662

#SPJ9

6 0
2 years ago
Explain ONE instance in which the Spanish resorted to the type of actions threatened in the third paragraph.
Alika [10]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

You forgot to include the text or the third paragraph. Without that information, we do not know what you are referring to.

However, doing some deep research, we can comment on the following.

One instance in which the Spanish resorted to the type of actions threatened in the third paragraph was to punish the Native peoples who refused to obey the conquerors and refused to convert to Catholicism.

The Spanish have threatened the Indians expressing threats such as <em>"...But, if you do not obey, we shall powerfully enter into your country, and shall make war against you and shall subject you to the yoke and obedience of the Church and the king and queen of Spain."</em>

Spanish conquerors committed many atrocities when they tried to colonize many territories in the Americas. all in the name of God and the Catholic church.

This was part of a medieval document titled "The Demand." This document was issued by the council of Castile in 1510. When conquerors arrived in the Americas, they had to read the document to warn Native Indian peol¿ple, before taking their territories.

8 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!! Willing To Type Short Response To This
jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

The leaders of the American Revolution made three great gambles. First, they sought independence from the powerful British Empire, becoming the first colonies in the Americas to revolt and seek independence from their mother empire. Second, they formed a union of thirteen states, which was also unprecedented, for the colonies had long histories of bickering with one another. Third, the revolutionaries committed their new states to a republic, then a radical and risky form of government. In a republic, the people were the sovereign—rejecting the rule of a monarch and aristocrats. Today we take for granted that governments elected by the people can be stable, long lasting, and effective. But the Americans in the new nation were not so sure, given the lessons of history. In 1789, the United States was the only large republic in the world; the others were a handful of small city-states scattered in Europe, and none of the larger republics in the history of the world had lasted very long. Like the ancient republic of Rome, they had collapsed and reverted to some form of tyranny, usually by a military dictator.

Any one of those three gambles was an enormous risk. The miracle was that the revolutionaries pulled off all three of them, winning their war against the British, and securing a generous boundary in the peace treaty of 1783: west to the Mississippi, south to Florida, and north to the Great Lakes, with the Atlantic Ocean as the eastern boundary.

During the mid-1780s, however, the new nation seemed about to collapse as quickly as it had been created. The first constitution of the United States was the Articles of Confederation, adopted in 1781. It proved too weak to control the powerful state governments. Unable directly to tax people, the confederation lacked its own revenue and could not afford an army or a navy, or even to pay the interest on its massive war debt. American Indians defied the confederation, and the Europeans insisted that no republic could endure on such a big geographic scale.

Plus the states were roiled by social conflicts between the wealthy gentlemen and the common people over issues of credit or debit. Gentlemen faulted the state governments for pandering to common voters by offering to relieve debtors at the expense of their creditors, those gentlemen who had loaned them money and goods. The gentlemen concluded that the state governments were too democratic, which meant too responsive to public opinion. And when a rare state government did favor the creditors, it provoked resistance from armed farmers.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Who was in charge of the concentration camps?
iren2701 [21]

Answer:

I believe the answer is adolf hitler and his nazi army

5 0
2 years ago
What significant event happened in May 1945 that helped end the war?
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

Germany surrendered, bringing fighting to an end in Europe.

Explanation:

4 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why do you think Japan chose a Sunday morning to launch its attack?
    7·1 answer
  • Why are county governments important in texas?
    5·1 answer
  • What scientific breakthrough did Charles Darwin's conclusions lead to?
    11·1 answer
  • Use the drop-down menus to identify the underlined phrase in each sentence. The students carrying boxes into their new dorm room
    15·2 answers
  • What did the Battle of the Marne signify?
    8·1 answer
  • Next, research the US population in 2015 on the Internet. Note the total population of the United States, and analyze the popula
    15·2 answers
  • 2 ways India and South Africa’s paths to independence were the same and 2 ways they were different.
    12·1 answer
  • Cultural context affects communication more than cultural values.
    5·1 answer
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    11·1 answer
  • What was the wilmot proviso, and how did it impact the national debate over slavery?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!