Answer:
Post split Shares: 800,000
Post split par value: $0.25
Explanation:
Stock split seeks to increase the number of shares available for trading on the exchange thus increasing the liquidity. Stock split of 4 for 1 increases the shares by 4 times e.g. every holder of 1 share will receive total of 4 new shares. Thus the shares will increase to 4 times: (200,000 * 4) = 800,000.
Post split share price is calculated by dividing par value to the proposed split.
($1 / 4) = $0.25 per share.
Answer:
e. Company Heidee has a higher ROE than Company Leaudy.
Explanation:
Return on equity measures how well the management of a business uses owner's equity to get returns. It is calculated by dividing net income by owner's equity.
That is
ROE= Net Income ÷ Owner's equity
Considering the accounting equation
Asset= Liability + Owner equity
Owner equity= Asset - Liability
From the equation when a company that take on more debt owner's equity will reduce.
The effect of reduction in owner's equity on Return on Equity is that it will increase the ratio, since owner's equity is the denominator.
In this scenario both companies have the same profit margin so if company Heidee has higher debt ratio it follows that it also has a higher ROE than Company Leaudy
Answer:
permanent roles, and contract roles.
Answer:
decreased by 20%
Explanation:
Supposed we have input price of $30,000 and it produced an output of 300 units on the first year of operation. The cost per unit on the first year is $100 each ($30,000/300).
On the second year we still have the same input expense of $30,000 but the productivity output increased by 25%. So we have 375 units produced on the second year’s operation. The new cost per unit would be $30,000/375=$80 per unit.
Therefore we conclude that based on the example given, the new unit cost per product decreases by 20%.
$100-80 = $20
$20/$100 = 20%
A minimum wage can purpose advantage and disadvantage price-push inflation.elevating wages reduces expensive employee turnover and will increase productivity.
Elevating the federal minimal wage to an hour is a coverage purpose for many lawmakers. growing the minimal salary is expected to lift people out of poverty and enhance work ethic, however, it also comes with many feasible negative implications, which include inflation and a loss of jobs.Elevating the federal minimal wage may even stimulate customer spending, help corporations' bottom lines, and grow the financial system it might additionally raise the overall financial system by using producing extended patron demand.
Elevating wages reduces expensive employee turnover and will increase productivity. while the minimal salary is going up, employers can obtain such benefits without being positioned at a competitive disadvantage, because all groups of their field are required to do the identical.
A minimum wage can purpose price-push inflation. this is because corporations face an growth in charges that are in all likelihood to be passed on to clients. that is even more likely if wage differentials are maintained.
Learn more about wage here:-brainly.com/question/26699459
#SPJ4
