1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fittoniya [83]
3 years ago
9

The great war ushered in significant changes to the political borders within europe. Evaluate the following two maps, which depi

ct europe in 1914 and europe in 1919. What impact did world war i have on europe’s borders?.
History
1 answer:
Natasha_Volkova [10]3 years ago
7 0

As a result of WWI, 4. The Austro-Hungarian empire was divided into two nations, <u>Austria and Hungary.</u>

<h3>Territorial changes after WWI </h3>
  • Countries that lost were made to lose territory and cede it to the victors.
  • Some territory was used to establish new nations for previous minorities.

One such nation that lost was Austria-Hungary. Their empire was broken up into several nations including the independent nations of Austria and Hungary.

Find out more on Austria-Hungary at brainly.com/question/20898629.

You might be interested in
The naturalization process has created millions of new American citizens over many
Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

It has a very big impact.

Explanation:

Without the naturalization process many immigrants wouldn't have been able to come to the US and become a citizen.

5 0
3 years ago
In what way did United States government promote conservation of our resources during the war in order to have enough supplies f
Wittaler [7]
The correct answer is "The government required rationing and encouraged growing of victory gardens."

The United States Food Administration was the federal agency in charge of rationing food and creating propaganda to encourage citizens to preserve food. This included cutting down on the amount of bread citizens ate on a weekly basis.

Along with this, the planting of victory gardens allowed for increased agricultural output. This meant more food that could be sent to the troops.
7 0
3 years ago
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Honorius, emperor of the west, moved his capital from __________.
Darina [25.2K]
Emperor Honorius moved<span> the </span>capital<span> of the </span>Western<span> empire to this northern Italian city.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
4. How does the substitution effect work when the price of an item drops?
dimaraw [331]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Due to a psychological process, consumers willl see something cheaper and feel the need to get it before the price rises again

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe three problems that have been encountered in establishing stable governments in Latin America. Why have
    13·2 answers
  • Angelo knew that 64 = 8 × 8. Which expression also equals 64? A. 9 × 7 B. 10 × 6 C. 5 × 12 D. 32 × 2
    5·1 answer
  • What inspired nat turner to lead a slave uprising
    12·2 answers
  • Nami conducts an investigation on plants. She places a grow light on a timer to give the plants different amounts of light to se
    7·3 answers
  • What contributed to France's financial crisis in the late 1700s?
    8·2 answers
  • Question 1 (1 point)
    12·2 answers
  • What is an effect of industrialization on women's lives?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about the Union Army in the Civil War is FALSE?
    8·2 answers
  • 2. How is the idea of social contract from the Mayflower Compact reflected in
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone tell me a few important facts about all these battles in ur own words:
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!