Answer:
the reason foe the decline kf the mughal empire was a series of foreign invasions. this affected the emlir badly. the empire was drained of its wealth,weakness,trade industry and power of military
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The Compromise of 1850 was the result of the debate over the equal representation of pro-slavery States in Congress. With the Mexican Cession, the balance seemed to favor the abolitionist States. Therefore a crisis began, with the most important matter being the incorporation of California. President Taylor felt that the matter was used by the South as a bargain chip, and finally declared California a State. Clay then brokered the Compromise, and its results were administered by Franklin Pierce who supported the general lines of the Compromise, but failed in the end to address at full the growing abyss between slaver's States and the anti-slavery States. The result was the crisis of 1860 and the break of the Civil War.
He believed and suggested that Germans should have the treaty of Versailles reversed and that they should not be punished as harsh as they were for world war 1 and that they should once again become a strong and a proud country that they were before world war 1. This resonated well with the people who supported this, however, he saw the path to this greatness through war and genocide and attacking everyone in Europe.
On June 25, 1950, the Korean War<span> began when North </span>Korea<span>, supported by the Soviet Union and China, invaded South </span>Korea<span>, which was supported by the </span>United States. General MacArthur, leader of theUnited<span> Nations forces, drove the North Koreans back across the divide, yet encountered a Chinese invasion.</span>
1829, having been passed by the supreme court, under the leadership of John Marshall who was a VERY big government man, in 1924.
However, the side he came down on in the Maysville Road veto was that the Maysville Road was totally local and therefore federal funds should not be used for local issues. Then again, he may have opposed the bill simply because Henry Clay supported it and those men hated each other.
So perhaps by his veto of the Maysville Road bill, he was saying he did not agree with Gibbons v Ogden but like I said, to my knowledge, there is no record on how he felt about it (but I am sure he had an opinion because the man had opinions about EVERYTHING