Answer:
John should include $1,600 as rental income on his Year 4 tax return as a result of the $2,000 payment.
Explanation:
As a cash-basis taxpayer, John's taxable income is based on the actual cash receipts and payments made in the accounting period. The refundable part of the rent should not be included as rental income since it is a security deposit that would be returned at the end of the lease period. If John were an accrual-basis taxpayer, the rental income to be included would have been only $800 representing income for Year 4.
Answer:
The role of project managers is vital for the succcess or failure of project.
Explanation:
The success of projects concentrates on developing key business metrics. However, sometimes development programs are still unsuccessful. There are a number of reasons why these initiatives fail such as lack of funding, weak measurements, lack of coordination among team members, and decisions based on speculations instead of evidence and facts. Such types of issues make it much more difficult for project managers to establish credibility for future projects. Ultimately, the accomplishment or effectiveness of the strategy concentrates entirely on the shoulders of the project manager, and he or she is held responsible for the final outcome.
Project evaluation from the <u>local</u> viewpoint serves some useful purposes and/but should <u>be </u><u>subordinated</u><u> to</u> the <u>parent's</u> viewpoint.
Project evaluation is the process of measuring the success of a project, program or a portfolio. The project evaluation process has been around as long as projects themselves.
In a project, every aspect of the project such as risks, costs, scope, or return on investment (ROI) is measured in order to determine if it’s proceeding as planned. Thus, it should be subordinated to the parent's viewpoint.
Hence, it requires the evaluator to gather important information to analyze the process and outcome of a certain project.
To learn more about Project evaluation here:
brainly.com/question/23897971
#SPJ4
Answer:
(a) 2 and 9
(b) 5, 6 and 7
(c) 1, 4 and 8
(d) 3
Explanation:
(a) financial statement audits,
2. Determine whether an advertising agency’s financial statements are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. ( independent (external) auditors )
9. Report on the need for the states to consider reporting requirements for chemical use data. d governmental auditors Render a public report on the assumptions and compilation of a revenue forecast by a sports stadium/racetrack complex. ( independent (external) auditors )
(b) compliance audits,
5. Investigate financing terms of tax shelter partnerships. ( governmental auditors (IRS) )
6. Study a private aircraft manufacture’s test pilot performance in reporting on the results of text fights ( internal auditors )
7. Conduct periodic examinations by the U.S. Comptroller of Currency of a national bank for solvency. ( governmental auditors )
(c) economy and efficiency audits, and
1. Analyze proprietary schools’spending to train students for low-demand occupations ( governmental auditors )
4. Compare costs of municipal garbage pickup services to comparable services subcontract to a private business. ( internal auditors )
8. Evaluate the promptness of materials inspection in a manufacture’s receiving department. ( internal auditors )
(d) program results audits.
3. Study the effectiveness of the Department of Defense’s expendable launch vehicle program. ( governmental auditors )
Explanation:
Looking from a fair point of view, the White owners of businesses have legitimate reasons to feel that the Act constitutes illegal reverse discrimination.
Remember, reverse discrimination implies an unfair treatment of the majority group (White owners) in an effort to please the minority group. This is evident from the fact that the 10 percent of all federal grants to be released by the Economic Development Administration was only to be used to purchase services or supplies from businesses owned and controlled by U.S. citizens belonging to one of six minority groups excluding the White business owners; making the White owners feel discriminated against.
Thus, unintentionally the Act became a reverse discrimination on White business owners.
