1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maxonik [38]
3 years ago
5

You can buy property today for $2.2 million and sell it in 5 years for $3.2 million. (You earn no rental income on the property.

) a. If the interest rate is 10%, what is the present value of the sales price?
Business
1 answer:
Stolb23 [73]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

PV of the sales price  $1,986,948.23

 

Explanation:

We will calcualte the present value of the sale price using the present value of a lump sum formula:

\frac{Maturity}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV  

Maturity 3,200,000

time                         5 years

rate         10% = 10/100 = 0.1

\frac{3200000}{(1 + 0.1)^{5} } = PV  

PV        $1,986,948.2338  

This indicates the 3,200,000 in five years are equivalent to 1,986,948.23 dollars Thus, this investment is not profitable as the property will be purchased at 2,200,000

You might be interested in
Statement: "Whenever a company’s activities reduce the quality of life for nearby homeowners, the company should be legally requ
olganol [36]

Answer:

2) assumption not made

Explanation:

The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.

maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.

4 0
3 years ago
According to the law of comparative advantage, both individuals and nations will be able to produce a larger joint output if eac
zzz [600]

Answer:

the low opportunity cost producer. 

Explanation:

A person or nation has comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other countries or people.

For example, let's assume country x produces either 10 Apples or 5 oranges in 1 hour while country y produces either 20 Apples or 2 oranges in one hour. The opportunity cost for country x of producing apples and oranges are 0.5 and 2 respectively. While for country y, the oopportunity cost of producing apples and oranges are 0.1 and 10 respectively.

Country y has an opportunity cost and comparative advantage in the production of Apples while country x has a comparative advantage in production of oranges.

I hope my answer helps you

5 0
3 years ago
Suppose the chester company begins to compete through good designs, high awareness and easy accessibility for their existing pro
masya89 [10]

The Chester company is likely implementing a strategy called the niche differentiation. This is the process in which helps a specific organization or company to coexist by having to use their environment in a different way in when they are to compete.

6 0
4 years ago
Suppose a firm that produces for this market is able to dump toxic chemicals into a river next to its factory, which poisons wil
Hatshy [7]

Answer:

an externality

Explanation:

Externality -

It is the cost or the benefit received by the third party , is known as externality .

The third party does not have any control over the creation of the cost or the benefit .

The externality can be negative as well as positive and can arise from the production or consumption of the services and goods .

hence , the correct term fro the given statement is an externality .

5 0
3 years ago
Would you rather work for an organization where everyone knows what others are earning or an organization where this information
s2008m [1.1K]
I'd rather work for an organization where there is transparency on all earnings of the formal employees. Transparency is a great motivation cultivator that results in more job satisfaction. It also breaks the boundary between management and employees as well as eliminating aspects such as workplace discrimination.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following charitable contributions is not tax deductible? a. Time donated to a qualified veterans’ organization. b.
    12·1 answer
  • Edwards Auto Body uses a job order cost system. Overhead is applied to jobs on the basis of direct labor hours. During the curre
    5·1 answer
  • Happy Foods and General Grains both produce similar puffed rice breakfast cereals. For both companies, the cost of producing a b
    9·1 answer
  • Avent, Inc. is a real estate investment company located in Boston, Massachusetts. Avent was approached by a property owner in No
    10·1 answer
  • A cell phone company charges $1.25 for a long-distance phone call, plus an additional $0.15 per minute. If Kyle wants to spend l
    5·1 answer
  • Where would you find the Create Table Dialog Box?
    9·1 answer
  • Samuel, Inc. has Accounts Receivable of $110,000 and an Allowance for Doubtful Accounts of $17,000. If it writes-off a customer
    10·1 answer
  • The following data was identified by Raines Corp. in preparation of its bank reconciliation on October 31, 2017:
    13·1 answer
  • In a relatively new neighborhood with 524 homes, 72 houses were sold. The turnover index in this neighborhood is
    6·1 answer
  • Vitalink company does marketing research and then plans, creates, and places various forms of paid communications about its clie
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!