1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marishachu [46]
2 years ago
6

What historical evidence does Washington show that he is an effective leader

History
1 answer:
Zolol [24]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

"Washington appears to have been one of those rare individuals in world history who fit the needs of his time. What made Washington a great leader was his understanding of what had to be done. As president, Washington realized that the new Constitution had to be made to work if democracy was to take root on American soil. This would not happen if he had chosen to become a lifetime king or if federal laws were ignored. It was also clear to Washington that the new experiment in a representative government would likely fail if the infant nation became involved in European conflicts."

hope this helps :)

You might be interested in
Can ya help me please?
IceJOKER [234]
The correct answer is A
5 0
3 years ago
Pretend that you are a newspaper reporter from the North traveling to the South>Write a newspaper article to inform your Nort
swat32

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

This would be the title of the article:

"Indeed we are different. They vs. Us."

It is not easy to understand the fact that if we are all called Americans, why are we so different?

The country is the United States. But we are not United, and the states are confrontational.

Without a doubt, the North is so different than the South, and this is hurting and dividing the nation.

I am arriving from the South. What an interesting trip to that region. It opened my eyes. We are one nation, clearly divided into two. We, the northerners. They, the southerners.

Sectionalism is one factor that has influenced this separation. I realized there are some reasons that have caused this sectionalism. Of course, slavery, economic differences, culture, and legislation.

The cultural differences are remarkable and you can see them reflected in society.

Here, in the North, we are more urbanized. There is a lot of industry and urbanization is the result of better infrastructure. Although low-paid jobs are offered in industries, at least there are jobs for everyone. That is not the case in the South. They depend totally on slaves. Most people live from agriculture, growing cash crops. For them to be successful, they need slaves.

Religion is not a major issue in the North. We have faith in God and try to be good citizens. In the South, religious fervor is notorious.

Education is another factor that separates us from the South. The school system is different and there are more schools here in the North.

Finally, politics and legislation. The North is not segregationist. On the contrary, we oppose slavery. We think the new states should be "free states." The southerners think the opposite, new states should be "slave states."

Is there any short-term solution to decently resolve our disputes and differences?

I don't see any coming.

Maybe, it is just a matter of time.

6 0
2 years ago
The Netherlands were successful at, and depended on,
ohaa [14]
Generally speaking, the Netherlands were successful at, and depended on, "<span>maritime trade," based mostly on their proximity to the ocean, however agriculture also played a major role. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which ship exploded, causing the United States to become involved in the Spanish American War?
patriot [66]
The Maine exploded, causing the United States to become involved in the Spanish American War. It was supposed to have a friendly mission, but resulted in a war.
8 0
3 years ago
What issue was addressed in Articles 9 and 11 of the Law of April 6, 1830?
Volgvan
Language
Watch
Edit
The Law of April 6, 1830 was issued because of the Mier y Terán Report to counter concerns that Mexican Texas]], part of the border state of Coahuila y Tejas was in danger of being annexed by the United States. Immigration of United States citizens, some legal, most illegal, had begun to accelerate rapidly. The law specifically banned any additional American colonists from settling in Mexican Territory (which included both California and Texas, along with the areas that would become Arizona, parts of Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah.) It also outlawed slavery in Texas.[1]
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the conflict between Pope Gregory and King Henry IV?
    6·2 answers
  • What was one argument that Angelina Grimké used against Catharine
    9·2 answers
  • The Electoral Vote is tied between two presidential candidates. What happens next?
    6·1 answer
  • First to write<br> about Native<br> Americans in<br> Texas
    9·1 answer
  • 40 POINTS PLEASE HELP QUICKLY!!! determine whether certain hypothetical laws passed by Congress are constitutional. Post a detai
    14·1 answer
  • What should you look for in internet research sources? a. Reliability c. Authority b. Accuracy d. All of the Above.
    6·2 answers
  • How did the role of religion differ between feudal japan and feudal europe?
    8·1 answer
  • Ancient Egypt was a polytheistic society. What does this mean?
    12·1 answer
  • Which description of the phrase "literary structure” is correct?
    12·1 answer
  • Identify the form/s of government of<br> china.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!