Answer:
B) The definition of crime is subjective and depends on who commits the crime and what type is committed.
Explanation:
The main point of the passage is to prove that a person who commits crime, does not think so about his/her action.
In the first part (open basket, coffee can and wooden money boxes), he proves that when situation is tempting or easy for stealing people may commit this crime, but when it is difficult to steal, people don't commit this crime.
In next part he makes a comparison of above situation with an office worker who does not pay for a bagel. He knows that there is some difference in stealing intentionally and not paying for bagel, but still he concludes that, an office worker who does not pay one dollar, is very unlikely to leave the office without paying if his bill is more than one dollar.
From both these situations, he concludes that crime is subjective and depends on situation i.e. who committed and what type of crime it is.
Option A (first) is incorrect as all the emphasis on the paragraph lies on proving subjectivity of crime.
Option C (third) is not a definition at all.
Answer:
I'm thinking C.
Explanation:
At the beginning, the mom was talking about peer pressure.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
it is ground level so it's at the bottom
The stanza that illustrates that the city of London is looking ahead with renewed vigor is this one: "Me-thinks already, from this chemic flame, I see a city of more precious mould: Rich as the town which gives the Indies name, With Silver paved, and all divine with Gold." In spite of the calamitous nature and devastating effect of the Great Fire (1666), which Dryden describes so vividly in this famous and extensive historical poem, the author chooses to be optimistic and hopeful, and he even ventures to compare post-fire London with the prosperous city of Mexico ("the town which gives the Indies name"), then under Spanish rule.