Conclusion: It can be concluded that opportunity for growth and promotion outside, compensation, working conditions, work timings/shifts, relationship with managers, location of the organisation, opportunity to use kills and work load are the major reasons for employee turnover.
Answer:
Explanation:
Answer:
Decorative Concrete
1. This contingent liability should be disclosed in a note only.
2. Decorative Concrete should not report any loss in its income statement, yet.
3. Decorative Concrete should not report any liability in its balance sheet, yet.
4. No entry should be recorded in the journal.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Estimated loss = $1.1 and $4 million
Loss is probable but the loss cannot be reasonably estimated
b) Decorative Concrete cannot reasonably estimate the loss that may arise from the contingent liability. Therefore, it should only disclose the future event in a note to the financial statements. Accounting rules specify that Decorative Concrete should record this event as a contingent liability in its accounts when it is probable that the future event will occur and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. At that time, a specific amount of loss will be recorded (debit) and a specific liability established (credit) in advance of the settlement. In this Decorative's case, only one condition is met.
Answer:
The answer is the other person’s nonverbal communication.
Explanation:
The concept mentioned in the question comes from Albert Mehrabian’s misquoted research results, which stated that in communication, 55% of our perception about the conversation comes from non-verbal communication, 38% from the tone of the speech, and 7% from the actual content of the conversation. However, this quote was wrongly cited, and Mehrabian himself has refuted this, since it is only selectively citing a research experiment that he conducted, which following research replicating the conditions have consistently debunked.
Answer:
.b This is a bilateral contract, and Mark is entitled to nothing because he did not perform
Explanation:
The contract is bilateral as obligation to perform exist for both parties.
Helen is obligated to pay the reward to the person who finds the cat and bring her home.
As Mark didn't find the cat it didn't perform (find the cat) Helen is not obligated to payup the reward for Fluffy
