The statement "both avoided centralizing political power in the hands of one person" best describes a similarity between the political systems in ancient Greece and the Roman Republic.
This is the declaration that best describes a similarity between the political structures in ancient Greece and the Roman Republic. both systems prevented centralizing power within the fingers of 1 man or woman. In the case of ancient Greece, there were no critical authorities. each city-kingdom had its own form of government, without an important power. Within the case of the Roman Republic, various institutions, such as the Senate, allowed authorities to be shared.
Historic Greece and Rome had very comparable authority structures. one of the motives why these empires are remembered is due to the fact they strayed away from letting one man or woman rule. Rather, they relied on the citizens of the empire to have little control over who would run their empire.
For instance, in historical Rome, the two consuls had been elected with the aid of a set of Roman residents. Those consuls were responsible for walking the authorities and the military. In historical Greece, the origins of democracy are observed. In Athens, there was a system in which Greek citizens were given without delay vote on legal guidelines and individuals in the government. This is called a right-away democracy. This was the first of it is the type and supplied a version for countries just like the USA.
Learn more about the Roman Republic here brainly.com/question/1566483
#SPJ9
“One of the strangest controversies in the history of Orientalism turned upon the “origin of bhakti”, as if devotion had at some given moment been a new idea and thenceforth a fashionable one. It would have been simpler to observe that the word bhakti means primarily a given share, and therefore also the devotion or love that all liberality presupposes; and so that inasmuch as one “gives God his share” (bhagam), i.e. sacrifces, one is his bhakta. Thus in the hymn, “If thou givest me my share” amounts to saying “If thou lovest me”. It has often been pointed out that the Sacrifice was thought of as a commerce between Gods and men: but not often realised that by introducing into traditional conceptions of trade notions derived from our own internecine commercial transactions, we have falsified our understanding of the original sense of such a commerce, which was actually more of the potlatsh type, a competition in giving, than like our competitions in taking.
War caused production rates to go up which led to increased economy and promoted womens rights.
Answer:
The writers of the constitution wanted a new plan of government because they felt the old plan gave too much power to the states and allowed too much democracy. They fixed these problems in the document that we now call the Constitution
Explanation:
