Search and seizure would mean something like the government taking your cell phone and going through every message you've ever sent, or entering your home and searching through all your dresser drawers. They need to have a court-approved reasonable cause for doing something that invasive.
Quartering of soldiers would mean soldiers would have the right to enter your home and expect you to provide them food and lodging. That's pretty invasive too.
In either case, we're talking about invasions of your privacy, your personal space. Court justices have used statements like those about search and seizure and quartering of soldiers to show that the constitution does give attention to citizen's right to privacy, even if not using the exact term "right to privacy."
Answer:
To develop an Asian ally against communism
Explanation:
After World War II, the US and Soviet Union emerged as the two major world powers. These two countries had extremely different goals after World War II. The US wanted to spread democratic and capitalist ideas to other nations while the Soviet Union wanted to expand their communist empire to other countries.
The US, worried that the Soviet Union would become more powerful than them, adopted a policy of containment during the Cold War. This policy was focused on stopping the spread of communism. This is why the US helped Japan after World War II, to ensure that communism did not spread to this country.
Enacted in 2002, the bipartisan<span> Campaign Reform Act, </span>ordinarily referred to as<span> the McCain-Feingold Act, </span>could be a<span> major federal law </span>control finance<span> for federal political candidates and campaigns. The law was designed </span>to handle 2<span> key campaign finance issues: </span>political contribution<span> and issue advocacy. According to the </span>legislative assembly analysis<span> Service, </span>a political contribution<span> is "a term of art </span>touching on<span> funds </span>typically looked as if it would<span> influence elections </span>however<span> not regulated by campaign finance law." </span>before the<span> enactment of McCain-Feingold, this </span>enclosed<span> "large contributions from otherwise prohibited sources. According to the Federal </span>Commission<span>, the </span>Bipartisan<span> Campaign Reform Act "includes </span>many<span> provisions designed </span>to finish<span> the use" </span>of sentimental cash<span> in federal elections</span>
The correct answer is - Two once mighty empires were collapsing because of internal strife and foreign invasions.
The Byzantine Empire managed to outlive Rome by approximately 1,000 years, but the way in which both, the Eastern and the Western Empire ended is pretty much the same.
Both Rome and Byzantine were very large empires, but as they were nearing their end, they were gradually losing their territories until the only remaining part of the empire was the most important city and the closest area around it.
The fall of these two empires was because of internal strife, where the aristocracy was only concerned about their personal interest and wealth, while totally forgetting the country, but also because of the multiple strong military forces that emerged on the scene and weakened them.
