Answer:
Probably not, because the terms are not definite.
Explanation:
A contract is considered to be valid when there is a written or expressed agreement for one party to deliver goods or services to another.
The terms are clearly stated. For example the price, time of sale, acceptance of price, and so on.
A valid contract has the following elements: offer, acceptance, agreement, and consideration.
In the given scenario where Kelly tells Matthew that she will sell him one of her motorcycles at some time in the future and Matthew eagerly accepts. There is an agreement but there is no specific offer and consideration of price and also the time of transaction.
So the contract is probably not valid because terms are not clearly defined.
Answer:
D) It is more economical for Baurisians to import meat than grain.
Explanation:
The argument states that meat consumption in Baurisia is steadily increasing while domestic production is not.
There are two alternatives:
- import more grains to feed more animals and produce more meat (the argument favors this option),
- or simply import more meat.
But if importing meat is cheaper than importing grains, then there is no need to import more grains in order to feed animals and later get meat from them, you just simply and directly import meat.
Is there some sort of word bank or something?
<span>An opportunity cost is the value or benefit that must be given up to acquire or achieve something else. In this case whatever you choose (Coke, Dr.Pepper or 7-UP) everything would be free , at zero cost. This means that the opportunity cost in this case is zero, because the drink is free.</span>
