1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Viefleur [7K]
2 years ago
15

A ________ is simply a document that describes, as specifically as possible, the nature of the problem for which research is sou

ght and that asks providers to offer proposals.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Ulleksa [173]2 years ago
6 0

I believe the answer is C, request for proposal (RFP), though feel free to correct me if I'm wrong

You might be interested in
Laurent saves money from his lawn service to buy a new $20,000 mower and trailer. He would like to buy the new equipment as soon
Alika [10]

Answer:

Laurent should invest in compound interest account.

Explanation:

Compound growth helps the assets rise quicker although interest is based on the accrued interest charges and also on the initial principal. Compound interest will produce a domino affect, when the initial money plus the profits received from those contributions expand together.

3 0
2 years ago
What were the two main classifications Hitler used in Germany?
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

B Aryans and Jews

Explanation:

This is because Aryans are young adults who are trying to be exactly like Hitler and Jews are one category of people that Hitler killed

5 0
2 years ago
Racial socialization, the process by which parents teach children about their ethnic identity and the experiences they may encou
frez [133]

Answer:

<h3>C) intolerance of the majority culture .</h3>

Explanation:

During the process of racial socialization, people are made to understand about their ethnic identity and culture and the experiences they may encounter within society.

Racial socialization helps individuals to get along in the mainstream society by teaching them ways to deal with racism.

Intolerance of the majority culture is not a process of racial socialization. It is an attitude that does not support the qualities of inter-cultural assimilation. It is the inability to embrace cultural and racial differences.

8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP A major development in relations between the Soviet Union and the United States occurred in the late 1980’s when the
White raven [17]

Answer:

About the author

Rebecca Johnson

Rebecca Johnson is Executive Director of the Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy.

Established upon the ashes of the Second World War to represent “We the Peoples”, it is not surprising that both peace and security were fundamental objectives for the United Nations. While many also wanted disarmament, countervailing lessons were drawn by some political leaders, which made it difficult to get multilateral agreements on disarmament for several decades. Debates around nuclear weapons epitomized and sharpened the challenges. Academics in the United States of America led in developing theories of deterrence to provide legitimacy for these weapons of mass destruction, which soon became embedded in the military doctrines and political rhetoric of further Governments, from NATO allies to the Eastern bloc and beyond. Deterrence theory sought to invert the normative relationship between peace and disarmament by arguing that nuclear weapons were actually peacekeepers amassed to deter aggressors rather than to fight them. From there it became a short step for some countries—including permanent Members of the Security Council of the United Nations—to promote ideologies that equated security and peace with high “defence” budgets and military-industrial dependence on arms manufacture and trade. This is the backdrop for understanding how the United Nations System and disarmament approaches have intersected since 1945, and the way in which reframing disarmament as a universal humanitarian imperative has opened more productive opportunities for future multilateral disarmament treaties.

The very first resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations, in January 1946, addressed the “problems raised by the discovery of atomic energy”. Despite civil society’s efforts, led by scientists and women’s peace organizations, leaders of the United States and the Soviet Union rejected measures to curb nuclear ambitions. As the cold war took hold, the leaders that had emerged “victorious” in 1945 raced each other to manufacture and deploy all kinds of new weapons and war technologies, especially nuclear, chemical and biological weapons (notwithstanding the 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibiting the use of chemical and biological weapons in war) and a variety of missiles to deliver them speedily anywhere in the world.

After early efforts to control nuclear developments floundered, it was the upsurge of health and environmental concerns provoked by nuclear testing that led the Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, and the Japanese Parliament to call for such explosions to be halted altogether. After an egregiously irresponsible 15 megaton thermonuclear bomb was tested in the Marshall Islands on 1 March 1954, Nehru submitted his proposal for a Comprehensive Nuclear-Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) to the United Nations Disarmament Commission on 29 July 1954. Since then CTBT has been the centrepiece of disarmament demands from many States, especially the developing countries of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). Intended as a first step towards disarmament, the driving force behind CTBT was concern about the humanitarian impacts. Early attempts at multilateral negotiations through a newly created Ten-Nation Committee on Disarmament made little progress. Although the leaders of the United States, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom professed their desire for a CTBT, their talks kept stalling. Obstacles from the nuclear laboratories and security advisors were dressed up as verification problems, but they stemmed from these nuclear-armed Governments’ military ambitions and rivalries, and their shared determination to keep their own weapons options open, even as they sought to limit those of others.

From 1959 to 1961, various resolutions were adopted by the General Assembly aimed at preventing the testing, acquisition, use, deployment and proliferation of nuclear weapons. In 1961, for example, General Assembly resolution 1664 (XVI) recognized that “the countries not possessing nuclear weapons have a grave interest, and an important part to fulfil” in halting nuclear tests and achieving nuclear disarmament. General Assembly resolution 1653 (XVI) went further, noting that the targets of nuclear weapons would not just be “enemies” but “peoples of the world not involved in…war”, with devastation that would “exceed even the scope of war and cause indiscriminate suffering and destruction to mankind…contrary to the rules of international law and to the laws of humanity”. And finally, General Assembly resolution 1665 (XVI), unanimously adopted, called on nuclear and non-nuclear weapons possessors to “cooperate” to prevent further acquisition and spread of nuclear weapons. These early resolutions fed into “non-proliferation” talks between the United States, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom, viewed as first steps towards disarmament.

4 0
3 years ago
TRUE OR FALSE Germany and the Soviet Union had made a pact to not invade each other.
AnnyKZ [126]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Germany and the Soviet Union made a German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact, which made them not to invade each other for 10 years.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Discipline, Integrity, Compassion, Courage and Humility. Please describe how you have demonstrated these core values in your per
    8·1 answer
  • What is the 17th president? ​
    7·2 answers
  • Why do you think it is important for scientists to be curious
    5·1 answer
  • Explain how to effectively care for children and young people's skin, hair and teeth
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describe the object relations school of personality development? (Check all that apply)
    6·1 answer
  • 20. How did Great Britain stop claims of Spain in the new world? a. By giving the gold b. By destroying the Spanish Missions on
    14·1 answer
  • A.
    15·1 answer
  • Which option best completes the diagram?
    14·1 answer
  • Select all that apply.
    13·2 answers
  • How important are party platforms to voters
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!