1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
arlik [135]
2 years ago
14

AYOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Who wants to be best friends forever and ever and ever? :>

History
2 answers:
Rzqust [24]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

sure why not.

Explanation:

Harlamova29_29 [7]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

depends how old are you

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What were the causes and effects of the Thirty Years’ War?
likoan [24]
One of the causes of the Thirty Years' War(1618-1648) was the growing religious and political tension between Roman Catholics and Protestant Christians. The effects of the war included the creation of the Peace of Westphalia and a start to remaking the religious and political boundaries in Europe.
3 0
3 years ago
Read the “Sources from the Past: The Meaning of Freedom for an Ex-Slave” section in your textbook. Answer the question at the en
erma4kov [3.2K]

Answer:

drfuvuihfifkgugyufugugugugufgcih

5 0
3 years ago
What would be the reactions of today's society if the Sons of Liberty had done the Boston Tea party now? Would everyone support
jolli1 [7]

Answer:

The ideas behind the Boston Tea Party can still be seen in politics today. The Sons of Liberty were angry about unfair government, so they protested through the destruction of government property. If, in modern day, the government was as unfair as it was during colonial times then these forms of protest would surely be popular. However, it is extremely unlikely that everyone would support it. Even back at the real Boston Tea Party a group called the loyalist did not support the Sons of Liberty. Similar groups would most likely form that would also disagree with a modern-day Boston Tea Party.

5 0
3 years ago
NEED HELP
lapo4ka [179]
Abundance of resources = trade/cooperation

Scarcity of resources = conflicts

The more resources you have the more likely a civilization was to get along with those around it, although at the same time if the civilization was weak and had a lot of resources it would be at risk of invasion/attack.
5 0
3 years ago
Receive from a family member who has died​
Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer:

Is that the question?

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How were many victims of the Palmer Raids treated?
    6·2 answers
  • Why was industrialization the center of all change in America?
    8·1 answer
  • Which two sources are secondary sources for an essay on World War II?
    9·2 answers
  • The __________ is charged with enforcing federal trade laws and promoting jobs and business opportunities in the US.
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a reason California became a state​
    8·1 answer
  • Which was a significant result of a battle of trenton?
    6·2 answers
  • Stephen F. Austin was used to being able to speak his mind in the United States, but Mexico did not have the same type of freedo
    5·2 answers
  • What does the exert federalist number 14 suggest about Federalists?
    12·1 answer
  • In what ways did the growth of cities change the lives of Americans?
    10·2 answers
  • Why are civil wars considered a family
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!