Answer:
Yes he may prevail
Explanation:
He wants to exercise his civic duty and he has every right to file a suit because he has been taxes indirectly to the city.
Firstly, The farmer does not pay any tax directly to the city because a portion of his farm property is turned over by the county to the city to support the city police department, which indirectly, he is paying tax because this support to the city is categorized indirectly as his tax.
Secondly, His farm property has been vandalized several times over the months and the police didn't do anything about it to improve his situation which calls for attention to why nothing has been done about it despite his support to the city police department.
With the two above paragraphs, he has a point and his also lives in one of the rural communities and the city ordinance provides that only residents of the city may vote, but the city ordinance is always the city ordinance, the law might and might not favor him, he could get payment for the damages on his properties, but it would be quite difficult for him to prevail over the suit because he doesn't live in the city
I believe the answer is interactioni<span>sm
</span>interactioni<span>sm is a perspective that viewed the behavior of individuals in a certain social group would affect the behavior of another individual.
Because of this, this perspective tend to study the actions and relationship displayed by members of the group, such as how intimate group members interract with one another.</span>
The answer to your question, would be that the result of landlords not maintaining their tenements got injured because they were in unsafe living spaces.
One disadvantage of the privately owned media is that is can be biased and it is not obliged to provide impartial (unbiased) information.
For example if the owner of the media has some opinion, he or she can force his or her workers to favour this opinion and to avoid mentioning the opposite side.
