Answer:
Tbh is sounds totally like something a 7th grader would write I don't see a problem.
Explanation:
I mean you could make it more wordy but there wouldn't be a really point.
Answer:
The Gadsden Purchase is a 29,670-square-mile region of present-day southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico that the United States acquired from Mexico by the Treaty of Mesilla, which took effect on June 8, 1854
Explanation:
Gadsden's Purchase provided the land necessary for a southern transcontinental railroad and attempted to resolve conflicts that lingered after the Mexican-American War. ... In 1853, Mexican officials evicted Americans from their property in the disputed Mesilla Valley
Answer: competence;insanity
Explanation:
What does competence or being competent mean legally?
Competent means a person has a capacity to reason effectively or it can mean qualified like when we refer to a court to make judgements.
A person is competent when they understand the cause and effect of their action and when they have full information necessary involved in what they are doing
.
Insanity refers to the actual mental state of the person which may be examined and declared by the doctors or psychologist.
This refers to whether a person suffers mentally or is mental unstable.
Under court order if a person is suffering from mental illness may be referred to a mental institution instead of going to jail.
Your answer to your question i think is B.)
Answer:
Maria exhibited moral relativism.
Explanation:
Moral relativism stands for an idea that there’s no such a thing as an absolute set of morals. It’s a version of morality that says “to each her own,” and those who follow it say, “Who am I to judge?”
Moral relativism can be understood in a few ways. For example, there is <em>cultural relativism</em>. It says that moral standards are <em>culturally defined</em>. There is also some common values that seem nearly universal, such as <em>honesty and respect</em>, but many differences appear across cultures when people evaluate moral standards around the world.
Societies make their moral choices based on their own customs and beliefs. People tend to believe that the “right” moral values are the values that exist in their own culture.
Normative moral relativism has the idea that all societies should accept each other’s <em>differences</em> in moral values, because there are no such things as universal moral principles. Philosophers don’t agree. Let’s say forbidding a woman to have a job is okay in some cultures, that doesn’t necessarily mean that other cultures cannot rightfully condemn it.