1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anni [7]
2 years ago
13

When it comes to historical research, which type of source (primary or secondary) do you think is better?

History
1 answer:
Arada [10]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Primary sources, because they can be more accurate about a certain incident or event.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which American objected to U.S. intervention in Cuba?
Kazeer [188]

It's A -  Andrew Carnegie

5 0
3 years ago
What are some ways treaties were used to remove the Cherokee and other native american groups from their lands
Fofino [41]

The treaties were used to remove the Cherokee and other native American tribes from their lands by telling and persuading them that they would be moved to a better 'more civilized' place for new life opportunities.

3 0
3 years ago
Which form of government does not provide for an orderly transition of leaders
Brut [27]
Dictatorship is the answe
7 0
3 years ago
Which best explains why Florida viewed President Abraham Lincoln as a threat? Lincoln was anti-slavery and Florida voters feared
Monica [59]

Answer:

A). Lincoln was anti-slavery and Florida voters feared he would start a war to prevent the practice of owning enslaved persons.

Explanation:

The key reason for Florida considering Lincoln(who was the president at the time) as a threat was '<u>Lincoln's anti-slavery attitude which made the voters of Florida fear that he might move to the extent of beginning a battle for the rights of slaved and against the ones who own them</u>.' He even says, 'if slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong.' Since Lincoln believed in leading the nation with morality, ethics, and constitution, this made Florida to think twice that his abolitionist attitude may pose a threat to them. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.

4 0
2 years ago
How did the similarities and differences between the Safavids and Ottomans lead to their constant struggle for power?
GalinKa [24]

Answer:

Similarities--- Muslims, armies and contribution to the art.

differences--- languages and sects

Explanation:

Both empires taxed the non-Muslims living in their kingdom. Both fought with each other to gain power and increase their lands. Both have powerful armies which help them to expanding their lands. Both empires contributed in the field of art, literature and architecture. The main difference between them was that the Ottomans were Sunni while the Safavids were Shiite Muslims. They spoke different language, the Ottomans spoke Turkish while the Safavids spoke Persian language.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why are the French forced to surrender to the British in September 1801?
    12·2 answers
  • Answer Now! <br><br>What did Abraham Lincoln's election contribute to the Southern Secession?
    7·1 answer
  • According to the US Constitution (before 1865) where was the issue of slavery left<br> to?
    11·1 answer
  • What role did jackson play in the battle at new orleans in 1815
    6·1 answer
  • Is kamala illiterate
    13·1 answer
  • Which statements correctly describe characteristics of the Maya's civilization?
    15·2 answers
  • How did Spanish rule and settlement affect life in the Louisiana colony during the 1700s? Check all that apply.
    13·2 answers
  • This is a belief that some races are innately
    6·2 answers
  • What are the key ideas of capitalism?
    8·2 answers
  • In fact, Jerusalem was taken from the north on the morning of July 15, 1099. The population was put to the sword by the Franks,
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!