1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Scilla [17]
3 years ago
5

Which was a negative outcome of the Dawes Severalty Act? . A) American Indians acquired very large tracts of land that they coul

d not reach easily, so it went unused.. B) American Indians were forced to overhunt the land, depleting the bison population.. C) The Wild West shows found a loophole within the Act that enabled them to buy huge tracts of land.. D)The railroads and speculators took the best land and left little fertile land for American Indians.
History
2 answers:
NikAS [45]3 years ago
7 0

Howdy, given the answer options and what i rememeber from history class the answe is D)The railroads and speculators took the best land and left little fertile land for American Indians. hope this helps please mark brainliest! :)

OLga [1]3 years ago
3 0

The railroads and speculators taking the best land and leaving little fertile land for American Indians was a negative outcome of the Dawes Severalty Act. The correct answer between all the choices given is the last choice or letter D. I am hoping that this answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.

You might be interested in
Why westward expansion create more conflict between the north and south
Eva8 [605]

In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the territory of Louisiana from the French government for $15 million. The Louisiana Purchase stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to New Orleans, and it doubled the size of the United States. To Jefferson, westward expansion was the key to the nation’s health: He believed that a republic depended on an independent, virtuous citizenry for its survival, and that independence and virtue went hand in hand with land ownership, especially the ownership of small farms. (“Those who labor in the earth,” he wrote, “are the chosen people of God.”) In order to provide enough land to sustain this ideal population of virtuous yeomen, the United States would have to continue to expand. The westward expansion of the United States is one of the defining themes of 19th-century American history, but it is not just the story of Jefferson’s expanding “empire of liberty.” On the contrary, as one historian writes, in the six decades after the Louisiana Purchase, westward expansion “very nearly destroy[ed] the republic.”

Manifest Destiny

By 1840, nearly 7 million Americans–40 percent of the nation’s population–lived in the trans-Appalachian West. Following a trail blazed by Lewis and Clark, most of these people had left their homes in the East in search of economic opportunity. Like Thomas Jefferson, many of these pioneers associated westward migration, land ownership and farming with freedom. In Europe, large numbers of factory workers formed a dependent and seemingly permanent working class; by contrast, in the United States, the western frontier offered the possibility of independence and upward mobility for all. In 1843, one thousand pioneers took to the Oregon Trail as part of the “Great Emigration.”

Did you know? In 1853, the Gadsden Purchase added about 30,000 square miles of Mexican territory to the United States and fixed the boundaries of the “lower 48” where they are today.

In 1845, a journalist named John O’Sullivan put a name to the idea that helped pull many pioneers toward the western frontier. Westward migration was an essential part of the republican project, he argued, and it was Americans’ “manifest destiny” to carry the “great experiment of liberty” to the edge of the continent: to “overspread and to possess the whole of the [land] which Providence has given us,” O’Sullivan wrote. The survival of American freedom depended on it.

Westward Expansion and Slavery

Meanwhile, the question of whether or not slavery would be allowed in the new western states shadowed every conversation about the frontier. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise had attempted to resolve this question: It had admitted Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the fragile balance in Congress. More important, it had stipulated that in the future, slavery would be prohibited north of the southern boundary of Missouri (the 36º30’ parallel) in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase.

However, the Missouri Compromise did not apply to new territories that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, and so the issue of slavery continued to fester as the nation expanded. The Southern economy grew increasingly dependent on “King Cotton” and the system of forced labor that sustained it. Meanwhile, more and more Northerners came to believed that the expansion of slavery impinged upon their own liberty, both as citizens–the pro-slavery majority in Congress did not seem to represent their interests–and as yeoman farmers. They did not necessarily object to slavery itself, but they resented the way its expansion seemed to interfere with their own economic opportunity.

Westward Expansion and the Mexican War

Despite this sectional conflict, Americans kept on migrating West in the years after the Missouri Compromise was adopted. Thousands of people crossed the Rockies to the Oregon Territory, which belonged to Great Britain, and thousands more moved into the Mexican territories of California, New Mexico and Texas. In 1837, American settlers in Texas joined with their Tejano neighbors (Texans of Spanish origin) and won independence from Mexico. They petitioned to join the United States as a slave state.

3 0
3 years ago
The table shows the outputs y for different inputs x:
lapo4ka [179]

Explanation:

Graphing Linear Inequalities

This is a graph of a linear inequality:

linear inequality y <= x +2

The inequality y ≤ x + 2

You can see the y = x + 2 line, and the shaded area is where y is less than or equal to x + 2

Linear Inequality

A Linear Inequality is like a Linear Equation (such as y = 2x+1) ...

... but it will have an Inequality like <, >, ≤, or ≥ instead of an =.

How to Graph a Linear Inequality

First, graph the "equals" line, then shade in the correct area.

There are three steps:

Rearrange the equation so "y" is on the left and everything else on the right.

Plot the "y=" line (make it a solid line for y≤ or y≥, and a dashed line for y< or y>)

Shade above the line for a "greater than" (y> or y≥)

or below the line for a "less than" (y< or y≤).

Let us try some examples:

Example: y≤2x-1

1. The inequality already has "y" on the left and everything else on the right, so no need to rearrange

2. Plot y=2x-1 (as a solid line because y≤ includes equal to)

6 0
3 years ago
Hitler’s views concerning the Jews and other groups he hated were immoral and insane. Why do you think so many Germans followed
hodyreva [135]

German people, whether Nazis or not, truly held to the idea that Germany was fighting for its freedom, even for its actual existence. But for Hitler, WWII was not about conquering former German territory in Poland or about consolidating nationalism for Germans living outside Germany. WWII was about the creation of a new racial order, one of German superiority over Slavs and Jews.

There was a strong politization of Germans after World War I. Once Hitler came to power in 1933, brainwash and seduction were the methods to reach German people. Even though questions of race, authority and loyalty were regularly deliberated, and only a minority became absolutely Nazis, most people were in agreement with the premises of the regime, including the confinement of German Jews. While most Germans had little idea about the Holocaust, this support made them accomplices of Hilter's "final solution".


5 0
3 years ago
What are THREE reasons why the city of Constantinople was named the capital of the Byzantine Empire?
ladessa [460]

Answer: 1. Constantinople was the ideal location because it was located within a two mile radius of the population center of the known world. 2. Was surrounded by water (good for trading, fishing, etc.) 3. Had a good harbor.

Explanation:

It was easy to defend and to reach.

8 0
3 years ago
What is the source of authority for the Federal government?
Serhud [2]
Hope this helps you and I think your answer is going to be the last one if not the last one then it is going to be the first one

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are the similarities between the first and second great awakening?
    7·1 answer
  • How new technology canged warfare during World war 1
    12·1 answer
  • Need help with a US history essay!
    8·1 answer
  • What is the last effect of The US standing against communism: effects: Vietnam war, cuban missile crisis, ?????.
    8·1 answer
  • How did King Alfred of England (r.871–899) contribute to the creation of a national identity in England?
    5·2 answers
  • What are the standard conventions of eastern theatre?
    14·1 answer
  • What is a significance of the Supreme Court decision Humphrey's Executor vs. United States?
    8·2 answers
  • The world was possibly minutes away from nuclear war when _____.
    7·2 answers
  • MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
    8·2 answers
  • Martin Luther King Jr. on the Vietnam War
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!