1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
S_A_V [24]
2 years ago
8

How was the removal of the Chickasaw from their homelands different from the other

History
1 answer:
9966 [12]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

sorry to answer this question

Explanation:

. please suggest me answer. it would be great help.

You might be interested in
Shoutout to everyone struggling for credits. yall got this!
eimsori [14]
Thank you I guess! I have really been trying to get the rank ambitious so thanks for the message:)
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not considered an example of one of the five major components of Egyptian civilization?
Ivenika [448]

Where is the rest of the question?

8 0
3 years ago
PLEAS HELP ME I NEED HELP THERE ARE 4 QUESTION PLEASE ANSWER ALL
Mandarinka [93]

1. is b

i belive the second one is b

3 is d

and 4 is c

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under the Royal Period, why was the rapid growth of tobacco successful in the colony of Georgia?
Lera25 [3.4K]

Under the Royal Period, the tobacco farming was constantly growing and becoming more and more profitable agricultural branch. The reasons for that was that after the introducing of the tobacco in Europe, people loved it, and also very quickly got addicted to it. The demand was constantly growing, and the price was very good. Georgia had the perfect climate and soil for the production of the tobacco, and with the ever growing demand, the production was also constantly increasing. Another factor was that Georgia has access to the sea, so the people were able to easily and cheaply sheep the tobacco for Europe, and of top of that, Georgia was one of the colonies that had one of the best relations with the British Crown.

4 0
3 years ago
By 1850, it was obvious that the only way slaves could be freed was through war’ How far do you agree with this assertion?
mote1985 [20]

Answer:

in my opinion, I agree with this assertion.

Explanation:

Because slave labor was vital to the southern economy and to other places around the world, it became apparent that the south, with a already strained relation with the north, would ally with outside countries to protect its economy. However, classifying the war as a war to free slaves is redundant as political tensions more closely characterized hateful views between the north and south. So with already strained tensions between the north and south, it was unlikely that slaves could have been freed diplomatically.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the island group in the West Indies?
    5·1 answer
  • This map shows the greatest extent of
    7·2 answers
  • Where did many of the early developments of the renaissance those place?
    9·1 answer
  • Help me please??? answer
    7·2 answers
  • In what year did Muslim power disappear in spain?<br><br>a. 1942<br>b. 1492<br>c. 1420<br>d. 1450
    5·1 answer
  • Explain what caused the movement to write the United States Constitution as a replacement for the Articles of Confederation.​
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the election of 1896 described as a “gigantic piece of stealing?”
    12·1 answer
  • .Which of the following did NOT contribute to the Dust Bowl?Immersive Reader
    14·1 answer
  • In what ways were medieval and renaissance hospitals similar? (8 marks)
    11·1 answer
  • Was the Japanese kamikaze attack justified <br> Why or why not<br> I give Brainliest! 5-7 sentences
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!