1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
brilliants [131]
2 years ago
8

BRAINLIEST!!! Controlling trade in the black sea affected the byzantine empire by:

History
2 answers:
muminat2 years ago
6 0
The answer is B I know cause I took the test and I got it right
masya89 [10]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Answer is B

Explanation:

It gave the byzantine empire access to valuable luxury goods.

You might be interested in
Describe the strageties emplemented during the war of 1812
jeka57 [31]
The British sneaked around at night. this was made famous when they burned down the white house.

4 0
2 years ago
3<br>: How did early early humans survive in the ancient world?​
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer:

Early humans survived because they created tools to fight and hunt for food. Also the creation of fire helped keep them warm and dry. Light helped scare predators and animals away.

6 0
2 years ago
Explain ONE cultural or economic change in the late twentieth century that historians who support the
adelina 88 [10]

Answer: transportation

Explanation: i did the saq

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to this graph, which year marked the biggest spike in population growth? A. 500 C.E. B. 1500 C.E. C. 1400 C.E. D. 1000
maksim [4K]

Answer: B

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can someone answer this
    8·1 answer
  • What do Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Francisco Franco have in common?
    15·1 answer
  • 2. What group of people made up the "First Estate"? What special privilege did they have?
    12·2 answers
  • What 3 reasons does John green give for America joining the war?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the enlightenment affect societies during the 17th and 18th century?
    8·1 answer
  • Igor Stravinsky was a member of the Russian Five.<br> O A. True<br> O B. False
    13·2 answers
  • (NOT A MAN<br> A BROTHER<br> LAND<br> The purpose of this image was intended to
    13·1 answer
  • Did the colonies and England<br> need each other? Explain.
    12·1 answer
  • Plzzz help it would mean ALOT!
    5·1 answer
  • In what ways are the revolutions in Latin America and the Caribbean similar to the French and American Revolutions? How do they
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!