I believe the answer is: C. People in Latin America were angry at US actions.
All of those ideology was created as an effort to obtain foreign policies that beneficial with united states. Basically, those ideologies dictate that US shall never make a direct threat to obtain benefit in negotiation, but must always have military backers to appear strong an authoritative.
In the perspective of other countries' , such method of negotiation is perceived as an act of intimidation, which is why many people in Latin America were angry at united states.
The North was occupied by the people of western England and mirrored their philosophy of hard word. The middle colonies were established by the people of Ireland and reflected their Celtic attitude of do enough to get the job done. The Deep South was settled by Prisoners in Georgia and political prisoners in Carolina (there was no north and south yet. These people were trying to establish a way of life that was distanced from that of Europe.
The McCulloch v. Maryland is the case that went to the Supreme Court because the state of Maryland wanted to tax the National Bank established by the Congress. The court ruled that under the Article I, Section 8, the "Necessary and Proper" clause that the state could not tax the institution of the the federal government. This is an landmark case and its effect was that this supported the federal government over the state governments.
Patrick Henry was not a contributor to the Federalist papers. John Jay, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton all helped author the documents. In fact, Patrick Henry (a founding father from Virginia) opposed the federalist movement, and feared that federalism would turn the new nation into a monarchy.
