Answer:
Solifluction
Explanation:
Solifluction involves the movement of soil particles or other materials which has been exposed to water down a slope. This process is common in areas with water bodies and a steep slope.
A major method by which material gets delivered to the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon is through the solifluction process as a result of the presence of water and steep slope.
I think it's pacific ocean, alantic ocean, indian occean, antartic ocean, and atic ocean hope this helps
<span>
Congress has the power to establish a national bank thanks to implied powers derived from those listed in Article , Section 8
</span>
Answer: two solar eclipses separated by one Saros cycle will have the same geometric characteristics (they will both be total, or partial or annular).
A Saros is a period of time of about 18 years 11 days and 8 hours and represents the time needed for the system composed by Moon, Earth, and Sun to return to its initial position.
Indeed, this is due to a natural harmony of the Moon’s motion: it takes 29.53 days to complete one orbit around Earth (Synodic Month), it takes 27.21 days to pass from the same node of its orbit (Draconic Month) and it takes 27.55 days to go from perigee to perigee (Anomalistic Month); the composition of these three motions gives one Saros of around 6585.3 days, composed by 223 Synodic Months, 239 Anomalistic Months and 242 Draconic Months (with a precision of few hours).
It has been observed that after one Saros cycle Moon, Earth and Sun are in the same initial position, therefore an eclipse occurring on day 1 of two consecutive Soros cycles would have the same geometric characteristics, which means that one Saros can be considered the periodicity of solar and lunar eclipses.
Due to the fact that a Saros is not composed by a whole number of days (we have a remainder of 8 hours), the two eclipses won’t be visible from the same location on Earth due to the rotation around its axis. It takes about 3 Soros for this to happen.
<u>Answer:</u>
He meant by the statement that the decision of the court would change how the law regarding abortion in the first trimester is exercised and make its use more confusing.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- After the court brought the law of abortion under the premise of the fundamental constitutional right to privacy or liberty, Justice Rehnquist questioned the broadness and the significance of the law and asked whether it is really that important to restrict the state from indulging into the matters of abortion in the first trimester of the pregnancy.
- He believed that the decision given by the court in the matter would make the use of the law more troublesome.
