1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kap26 [50]
2 years ago
9

How did the industrial revolution start? I really need well-developed explanation.

History
1 answer:
Vesnalui [34]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The development of agriculture was hallmark for the development of human civilization. Before that, humans had to focus their efforts on hunting and harvesting for food, so the effort existed to sustain life. After the development of agriculture, civilizations came to have a food security, that is, subsistence is no longer a doubt. From then on, society can turn its attention to other activities and has experienced a major evolution. One of the activities by which people could develop was work, which eventually led to the development of technologies. The industrial revolution is the result of the human capacity to work and create technological tools. This was only possible after the population had a food security, thanks to the agriculture revolution.

The commercial revolution allowed for two key components. First they allowed joint stock companies to put money into a company. If the company failed not all your money was lost. Second the commercial revolution allowed for major raw resources to be brought to Europe, which in turn was finished products.

You might be interested in
Which of the following are tactics that politicians use to raise money? A) fundraising in other countries. B) Dinners, speeches,
lukranit [14]
B I think I'm sorry if its wrong
7 0
3 years ago
Which statements about Franklin Roosevelt’s presidency are true?
jek_recluse [69]
Number 1 is the correct answer
7 0
3 years ago
Was Thomas Jefferson a hero or a hypocrite?
Gemiola [76]
"Was _______ a hero or hypocrite?" could be asked about almost any figure in history.  Human beings are complicated creatures who live amid conflicting situations.  Rarely do you find anyone who is totally consistent in every point of view they hold and every action that they take.

In the case of Thomas Jefferson, the "hero or hypocrite" question tends to focus on his ideals, as expressed in the Declaration of Independence (which he authored), that all people "<span>are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" -- as contrasted with the fact that Jefferson owned hundreds of slaves and fathered several children by Sally Hemings, one of his slaves.

Jefferson indeed was heroic as one of America's founding fathers to set this nation on a course of liberty and justice for all.  But slavery was deeply embedded in the colonies and not something easily or quickly undone.  Jefferson's slaves were those which he had inherited from his father or acquired by marriage to his wife, Martha (whose family also owned slaves).  Jefferson had criticized the British for sponsoring the slave trade.  He also led the effort to have the state of Virginia ban the importing of slaves in 1778.  Jefferson did have plans for the emancipating of slaves, seen in a bill he proposed as governor of Virginia in 1779, but recommended emancipation as a gradual process due to the complexities of the situation.  

So, "hero or hypocrite"?  The answer to that is not quick or easy.  Jefferson had ideas and plans to address the slavery situation, but recognized the need to proceed gradually in order to make such a transition without great turmoil affecting the new country.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Which was one reason people opposed the war in Iraq?
Ronch [10]
The United States had started a war without provocation from another country. is the answer that is correct, but depending on what state you live in they might want <span>The economy was not strong enough to support a war in the Middle East to be the answer</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
in the 1950s and the 1960s the USSR controlled eastern Europe nations via a number of methods including
Luda [366]
Good morning!

During the 1950s and 1960s, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics dominated various European nations using mainly its military influence and power: it invested in coups and seizures by force.

Hugs!
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which group was accused of violating human rights in the city of Nanjing during world war 2
    7·1 answer
  • In Haiti, the dictators are gone, democracy has a new day, the flow of desperate refugees to our shores has subsided. -- Preside
    6·1 answer
  • In order for any animal to grow, repair its body, reproduce, and carry out daily activities, it must have energy. When an animal
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the British plan to seize control of Albany, New York, in 1777?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the Spanish Seven Bishops myth influence exploration?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the name of the black Anime character with dreads?
    14·1 answer
  • How was the impact of being a female convict different to that of being a male convict?
    11·1 answer
  • How does Madison define “faction”? What are some examples of factions today?
    6·1 answer
  • Who was the trusted adviser of the Babylonian king, but was thrown into the lion's den for not worshipping
    7·1 answer
  • ILL MARK BRAINLIEST The partition of India was a direct result of which of the following: A) Some Indians wanted to remain withi
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!