I think it's B because a they have to review the original record since it is their job to decide whether the lower court decision was constitutional. And to do their job they also have to consider the arguements for each side. On a appeal no new facts are presented (fun fact). Frankly it's just my opinion, but B seems the most logical.
The Riegner telegram was a message sent to the Jew.
<h3>What is Reigner telegram?</h3>
The Riegner Telegram was message sent from Geneva in Switzerland to New York.
The message was a telegram and it was to convey information about the murder that was been planned for the Jew.
The telegram served as eye opener for the Jews.
Therefore, The Riegner telegram was a message sent to the Jew.
Learn more on Jew below
brainly.com/question/7986829
#SPJ1
He can serve two terms each is 4 years.
Answer:
The correct answer is D) The British government.
Explanation:
This is a supremacist statement to justify British imperialist expansion and whose full context is the following "Ours is a superior civilization. Our laws, our industry, our values, and our religion have been a gift to the world for centuries."