ImmigrantsThe Creek Indians meet with James Oglethorpe. By the time Oglethorpe and his Georgia colonists arrived in 1733, relations between the Creeks and the English were already well established and centered mainly on trade.Oglethorpe with Creek Indians to colonial Georgia came from a vast array of regions around the Atlantic basin—including the British Isles, northern Europe, the Mediterranean, Africa, the Caribbean, and a host of American colonies. They arrived in very different social and economic circumstances, bringing preconceptions and cultural practices from their homelands. Each wave of migrants changed the character of the colony—its size, composition, and economy—and brought new opportunities and new challenges to the people already there. A majority of the immigrant white population traveled to Georgia because of the availability and cheapness of land, which was bought, bartered, or bullied from surrounding Indians: more than 1 million acres in the 1730s, almost 3.5 million acres in 1763, and a further cession of more than 2 million acres in 1773.From EuropeDuring the Trusteeship (1732-52), the overwhelming majority of Georgia immigrants—more than 3,000 in number—arrived from Europe. Around two-thirds of these pioneers were funded by the Trustees, This sketch of the early Ebenezer settlement was drawn in 1736 by Philip Georg Friedrich von Reck. That same year the Salzburger settlement moved to a location closer to the Savannah River, where conditions were better for farming.Early Ebenezerwho offered them a passage across the Atlantic, provisions for one year, tools, and a tract of land in return for their labor.After 1752, under the headright system, every settler was entitled to 100 acres of land, plus 50 additional acres for each member of the settler's household, including slaves and indentured servants. (In 1777 the initial allotment per settler changed to 200 acres.) All settlers—men and women—could receive up to 1,000 acres of land through a headright grant. The headright grant was a primary mechanism for distributing land throughout royal rule and early statehood.
this is part 1
Hope this helps
The route he took is the second option.
The blue dot in the picture that I included is the correct answer.
Hope this helped. Have a great day.~
Conflict theorists were critical of parsons's structural functionalist theory because they argued it presented <u>"an unrealistic image of consenus and harmony in society."</u>
Structural functionalism is the theoretical viewpoint that looks to comprehend the capacity that every part of culture plays in supporting the structure of a general public. In trying to do this, one of its fundamental premises is the possibility that people and culture work with a specific end goal to help the structure of their general public. As a structural functionalist, Parsons was, extremely keen on the possibility of social request. In the same way as other of his auxiliary functionalist cohorts, he held to the utilitarian hypothesis of stratification, the possibility that various leveled class frameworks and requests were essential for society to work.
<span>After prophesying about John and Baptist who would be God's messenger to prepare the way for the coming Messiah, we are told that "suddenly the lord you are seeking will come to his temple; the messenger of the covenant, whom you desire, will come," says the Lord Almighty." Whereas John and Baptist was merely the messenger who would prepare the way before the Messiah, Jesus himself was the very Lord - the messenger of the new covenant.
Jesus was messenger of the new covenant, but much more than that, Jesus is very Lord whom Israel seeks. As other have said, Jesus was no mere mortal, no mere prophet. Check out the link below for the full names and title Jesus, as the Son of God.</span>
It’s first one beat when you feel it and turns to mass
