The problems between different cultural groups were caused by: C. a wave of immigrants moving to the cities of the northeast.
<u>Explanation:</u>
A cultural group is defined as a group of people who follows same beliefs, patterns of behavior, and values. The cultural group is identified by their behavior and way of thinking.
During 1850, the Northern cities have different cultural group. There were many conflicts between the cultural groups. This is was due to immigrants moving to the cities of the northeast.
Immigrants are people who move from their own country and settle down in another country.
The answer will be C. Soft Money
Hope it helps!
"D) <span>The era gave rise to Langston Hughes, Zora Neale Hurston, and "The Cotton Club" is the best option from the list, since this wan an era of impressive black performers and writers in New York City. </span>
The correct answer is - abolished the boyars.
Peter the Great was not very fond of the situation in which the previous rulers were, where they were heavily dependent on the boyars and also did not had full control of the situation because of them. In order to gain full control and authority in the country Peter the Great decided to abolish the boyars. Instead of the traditional boyar aristocracy, Peter the Great made the state service as the exclusive means of attaining a high position in the bureaucratic system.
The reason why Peter the Great thought that the boyers should be abolished in order for him to strengthen his authority was their influence and power, and he was not wrong. The boyars were the ones that were deciding and controlling the majority of the things in the country. They had very big local influence and power, having their own boyar council as well where they were deciding the politics and economics of the country. Peter the Great did not wanted to be in such a position where other people will decide what should happen in the country and in which manner, as he wanted to be the one that has the only and last say in the matters, so he made his move.
The federal claim was based on allegations that original ownership of the land was held by the united states before california was made a state, that former supreme court cases adjudicating state ownership were erroneous and should be overruled
