Analyzing the scenario, we see that the situation is repeated by the second. It may be that the first time, the woman did not know. But she had already been accused before, that is, that the second time, this was considered intentional and malicious conduct.
According to the penal code § 594, this act is considered vandalism, that is the defacing of another’s property with graffiti “or other inscribed material,” or damaging or destroying another’s property and this cant be done negligently, with the will to do the damage.
If she convicted of felony vandalism again, the maximum prison sentence is three years (after being convicted before) and fines can be up to $10,000. When the damage caused by the vandalism exceeds $10,000, the fines can be increased to $50,000. Then, comes the restitution (paying the owner property for the damage), and possibly community service.
1: mobilization of troops
2: blurry roles between civilian and soldiers
(civilians are legitimate targets)
3: refusal to peaceful compromise
(a war only ends when the enemy surrenders)
4: total control of society
(the channeling of a nation’s resources into the war - for example, factory workers who previously worked in the cotton textile sector were forced to build ammunition for WWI)
La Revolución Francesa también influyó en la política estadounidense, ya que las facciones pro y antirrevolucionarias buscaron influir en la política nacional y exterior estadounidense. ... Sin embargo, con el cambio revolucionario también vino la inestabilidad política, la violencia y los llamados a un cambio social radical en Francia que asustó a muchos estadounidenses.
The exchange that most affected the indigenous people was the one of diseases. Native Americans hadn't encounter the diseases the European brought before, so they hadn't develop immunity to them. This is the major reason of the large death of Native Americans, besides the war between them and the brutality of the Europeans.
