Answer:
Explanation:
I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.
Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.
C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.
It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.
I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.
"Many people believed they were convicted solely because they were anarchists" is the statement among the following choices given in the question that is true about <span>the Sacco-Vanzetti trial. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "A".</span>
Answer:
d. Battle plan to invade Northern France
Explanation:
The Marshall Plan was designed to do all of the following except "Battleplan to invade Northern France."
This is because the Marshall plan which was originally United States Secretary of State, Goerge Marshall in 1948, was a plan to
1. Provide military support to the resistance century against communism
2. Provide economic support to rebuild Europe, particularly the western part following world war II
3. Promote capitalism in Europe to stop communism from spreading from the USSR.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is " "Battleplan to invade Northern France."
They both express Buddhist ideas of humankind's relationship with nature and this is the way the Chinese painting and Japanese print are similar. The correct option among the two options that are given in the question is the first option. I hope that the answer has helped you.
