Answer:
1500 BC is the answer. Follow me!!
The correct answer would NOT be true.
If Patrick wants to be an entrepreneur, he should identify and exploit a new business opportunity. This is a key task that faces entrepreneurs in their work.
Answer:
In my opinion, I would be for the U.S. expansion. With the expansion comes opportunities for new jobs, farming, new trading routes, and overall a chance at a new life. Although it is inaccurate to say that I would be in need of a job considering that I did not live at the same, I would assume that those in need of farm land and work would appreciate the movement. If I were a rich man living in the city during the time of expansion, I would still agree with the expansion. Because of the amount of people in search of a job in the city, the streets were crowded, work places were filled to the top, and people were desperate for work. The expansion allows for these people to move and find new work somewhere else that does not interfere with my work. However, we can not overlook the horrible things that came with this movement such as slavery, the deaths of many people, and the basic fact that it was unconstitutional. In perspective, this question could differ depending on the person. I would have been against the expansion if I were an Indian whose home was taken and whose family was being killed by the travelers.
Explanation:
i dont know if this is good i just wrote something do what you will with it
Answer:
The 1920s and the 1950s in America were more similar than they were different.
Explanation:
During the 1920s and the 1950s, the United States was economically prosperous because of the surplus of jobs and new consumer markets. Also, in both decades, the U.S. faced the issue of terrorism and communism.
